I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.I think there is an underlying feeling that st Harold of Kane just isn't worth it.
Because we always seemed to have alternatives or beleive we could manage without. This time that isn’t the case.Why do people think that a club with a history of missing out on multiple top players due to not wanting to get shafted over transfer fees, wages, or agent fees, is suddenly going to buckle for Harry Kane?
Bingo.Stop stalking me , fed up of you
Him an all.and his brother John Silver?
The club still wouldn't shatter it's financial policies over this. We're not run by Ed Woodward.Because we always seemed to have alternatives or beleive we could manage without. This time that isn’t the case.
Well this is a forum, so I was trying to create discussion, but ok?I'll decide what to care or not to care about when it comes to my support of the club but thanks.
I'll be among the most fickle of the fickle in cheering him on as soon as he pulls on the blue shirt, but until then I'll stick to thinking he's an overpriced, overrated snide.I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.
I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.
No it wouldn’t and we’ll have a limit. We will pay what we can afford. We seem determined to get Kane, we will know we can’t get him for any less than £120 mill plus add ons IMO. If we thought he was out of our reach we’d have distanced ourselves from the stories, sounds like we’ve said we won’t pay 160 mill, but unlike other players haven’t said we aren’t interested.The club still wouldn't shatter it's financial policies over this. We're not run by Ed Woodward.