Harry Kane

[JimB]

That will not happen. Your captain wants to leave therefore you have to sell him otherwise you will have this nonsense to put up with all season long

What won’t happen?

Plenty of players have wanted to leave their club, been denied the opportunity, and then knuckled down to play to their best the following season. If Kane has to stay at Spurs, I have no doubt that he will do likewise.

Of course Spurs don’t want their players to be unhappy. But they have a right to hold on to Kane if no potential buyers make an offer that even gets close to his value to the club.

Kane was last season’s top goal scorer and assister. He has an incredible goal ratio. He is phenomenally consistent from season to season. He is England’s captain. He is one of the two or three best all round strikers in the world. He will likely become the PL’s top goal scorer of all time. He will likely become the all time top England scorer. He is at his peak. He has never relied on pace so, contrary to the common claim, he is unlikely to deteriorate at a comparatively young age. He has three years remaining on his contract. His value to Spurs is far more than it will ever be to City (simply because City will flourish regardless of whether you sign him or not).

So, from Daniel Levy’s perspective, it would make no sense at all to sell Kane this summer for £100m.

 

[TonyColemansbagofapples]

Same thing we here from the villa fans on the Grealish thread. Worth more to you than to us. Obviously they are because we are not a one man team. However, fuck Levy. He is not the messiah he's made out to be. In fact, he's such a genius he has taken you almost a billion into debt. You need to sell to improve your team / squad. With Kane in it last year, you managed the dizzy heights of SEVENTH. How do you suggest Sir Daniel manages to raise the necessary cash to even make top four? Visit the money tree?
It's the same scenario as with Bale. You need to sell your biggest asset, being totally reliant on him, and improve other positions and stop being the Harry Kane team and become Tottenham Hotspur.

 

[Ashleymcduff]

The games against Luiz were different circumstances. Look at what had happened previously is both games and tell me Luiz was innocent of any wrong doing. Sergio was receiving no protection whatsoever from the referees so had no option but to defend himself. Stop choosing two isolated incidents over a ten year period and trying to create a narrative.

69 yellows and 4 red cards says otherwise m8 ..

 

[Ashleymcduff]

He didn't throw him over the boards. The shithouse walked slowly back, eyeing up how far to go and then threw himself over. Personally would have loved Fern to have knocked his teeth down his throat. Unfortunately, that wouldn't have benefitted us in the long term.

yeah that’s was disgusting from cesc, little sly shithouse.

 

[SK14BLUE]

Same thing we here from the villa fans on the Grealish thread. Worth more to you than to us. Obviously they are because we are not a one man team. However, fuck Levy. He is not the messiah he's made out to be. In fact, he's such a genius he has taken you almost a billion into debt. You need to sell to improve your team / squad. With Kane in it last year, you managed the dizzy heights of SEVENTH. How do you suggest Sir Daniel manages to raise the necessary cash to even make top four? Visit the money tree?
It's the same scenario as with Bale. You need to sell your biggest asset, being totally reliant on him, and improve other positions and stop being the Harry Kane team and become Tottenham Hotspur.

Nail firmly on the head,great post

 

[Bluesince88]

What won’t happen?

Plenty of players have wanted to leave their club, been denied the opportunity, and then knuckled down to play to their best the following season. If Kane has to stay at Spurs, I have no doubt that he will do likewise.

Of course Spurs don’t want their players to be unhappy. But they have a right to hold on to Kane if no potential buyers make an offer that even gets close to his value to the club.

Kane was last season’s top goal scorer and assister. He has an incredible goal ratio. He is phenomenally consistent from season to season. He is England’s captain. He is one of the two or three best all round strikers in the world. He will likely become the PL’s top goal scorer of all time. He will likely become the all time top England scorer. He is at his peak. He has never relied on pace so, contrary to the common claim, he is unlikely to deteriorate at a comparatively young age. He has three years remaining on his contract. His value to Spurs is far more than it will ever be to City (simply because City will flourish regardless of whether you sign him or not).

So, from Daniel Levy’s perspective, it would make no sense at all to sell Kane this summer for £100m.

You talk some sense, main thing I’d have issue with it players not being allowed to leave and knuckling down etc, maybe however the theme at Spurs is when your top players want to leave, they do. Bale, Modric, Berbatov, Carrick. I actually can’t think of a time a top spurs player wanted to leave then didn’t.

 

[mdj0520]

To be fair mate, when it says: Team supported - Tottenham, it's a bit of a give away ; )

Lol can't see that on mobile, but at least I was right!

 

[Marvin]

What won’t happen?

Plenty of players have wanted to leave their club, been denied the opportunity, and then knuckled down to play to their best the following season. If Kane has to stay at Spurs, I have no doubt that he will do likewise.

Of course Spurs don’t want their players to be unhappy. But they have a right to hold on to Kane if no potential buyers make an offer that even gets close to his value to the club.

Kane was last season’s top goal scorer and assister. He has an incredible goal ratio. He is phenomenally consistent from season to season. He is England’s captain. He is one of the two or three best all round strikers in the world. He will likely become the PL’s top goal scorer of all time. He will likely become the all time top England scorer. He is at his peak. He has never relied on pace so, contrary to the common claim, he is unlikely to deteriorate at a comparatively young age. He has three years remaining on his contract. His value to Spurs is far more than it will ever be to City (simply because City will flourish regardless of whether you sign him or not).

So, from Daniel Levy’s perspective, it would make no sense at all to sell Kane this summer for £100m.

That is very weak. Rationally Spurs should sell.

 

[TonyColemansbagofapples]

69 yellows and 4 red cards says otherwise m8 ..

You including the yellows he got when being scythed down against Southampton and that European game when the keeper brought him down and booked for diving. Aguero was as honest as any player I've seen in over fifty years

 

[Ashleymcduff]

You including the yellows he got when being scythed down against Southampton and that European game when the keeper brought him down and booked for diving. Aguero was as honest as any player I've seen in over fifty years

Was that Monaco game ???

that was a clear as pen you’ll see all day.

I’m just using Kun as a example for the people who call Kane a dirty player.

I don’t think either player is a dirty player for the record.