Harry Kane

[skillman]

I bet if Haaland wasn’t around then the poll would be a lot more one sided in favour of Kane joining.

Like it or not, the guy is clinical and one of the best strikers in the world. Add to that his all round game then it’s a no brainer. Anybody saying otherwise either just doesn’t like him because he can be snide or is obsessed with Haaland and stumping up £10m to an agent.

 

[Centurions]

That's why I brought it up.

Always liked Nacho. He seemed to have an instinct for the job

An instinct? He took long enough finding it then.

 

[urban genie]

Don't know why anybody would muster up the energy to actively hate the lad.
Hes about as beige as you can get when it comes to a footballer.
He knows where the net is which is all that matters.

I can only assume a few factors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will not matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year.


I will be happy to see Kane arrive.

 

[Tricky_Trev]

I can’t believe we let Kun go without having a back up. He scored a cracker against palace and Everton and could have been getting back to his best. Would have been quite happy just buying Grealish and waiting 12 months for a striker.

You are overstating Aguero’s current level. The time was right for him to go, with or without a replacement being boxed off. Aguero only played about 700 minutes in the whole of last season, out of around 5.5k mins in total. That is someone that you can take out of the squad with a fairly minimal impact. We played Jesus or a false 9 before we played Sergio. It would have been no different this season if he were still here.

 

[Centurions]

I can only assume a few fqctors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will no matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year

6. We never pay that much for a player, despite the same posters thinking we should pay whatever it takes for Haaland.

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

I bet if Haaland wasn’t around then the poll would be a lot more one sided in favour of Kane joining.

Like it or not, the guy is clinical and one of the best strikers in the world. Add to that his all round game then it’s a no brainer. Anybody saying otherwise either just doesn’t like him because he can be snide or is obsessed with Haaland and stumping up £10m to an agent.

One rumour i've seen is that the reason the paperboy has been given a 4 year contract is because of his affiliation with Haaland, and that he could move there next season. 99.9% bollocks, but this place will implode if that happens.

Meanwhile i'll be playing replays of Kane getting the winner from a Grealish free kick in the CL final, then a repeat of each of his 30 goals from the title win. And I can bet the haters will still hate him.

 

[skillman]

One rumour i've seen is that the reason the paperboy has been given a 4 year contract is because of his affiliation with Haaland, and that he could move there next season. 99.9% bollocks, but this place will implode if that happens.

Meanwhile i'll be playing replays of Kane getting the winner from a Grealish free kick in the CL final, then a repeat of each of his 30 goals from the title win. And I can bet the haters will still hate him.

Thing is. I think I’d prefer Haaland purely because of longevity but that doesn’t mean Kane is a shit option - a lot of people on here can’t seem to make that distinction and think it’s one side or the other.

 

[BillyShears]

I can only assume a few factors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will no matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year.


I will be happy to see Kane arrive.

I wish I could like this post twice. Always weird when you see people become MORE negative and MORE entrenched the more obvious it becomes that we're going to sign a player. Why start out with such hostility towards someone who is going to be wearing a blue shirt? Each to their own I guess.

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

Thing is. I think I’d prefer Haaland purely because of longevity but that doesn’t mean Kane is a shit option - a lot of people on here can’t seem to make that distinction and think it’s one side or the other.

Of course, I think if you have the choice of the two you pick Haaland, but there is no guarantee of longevity as he is likely to leave after a few years, and there is no guarantee of him doing it in the PL within that time. Kane is a guaranteed goal machine and will hit the ground running. And of course if reports are true, he wants us whereas there are no reports that Haaland wants to come here.

 

[Great Kompany]

I don't get the - he won't get transferred until our match with Spurs.
WTF would anyone care IF he has made up his mind and Levy has sanctioned his sale.

Once he is City player, he can play any match we want. Unless Levy wants to keep his image tight and give us a good 10 mil discount on the transfer price for him to not play in the first PL match.