Harry Kane

My initial reaction was to tell you to leave the drugs alone for a while. But no, go on I'll bite, explain your 'reasoning' for such a statement ...

Did you see Kane last season? Was getting the kind of assist numbers De Bruyne usually puts up while scoring a shitload as well. He's phenomenal.
 
Going to get absolutely, categorically crucified for saying this (I'd expect no less as this is a Man City forum) but Kane is better than Agüero.

He isn't in my opinion, but that does not mean I am correct or you are wrong.

It is personal opinion and subjective
 
Well Kane right now is better than Aguero right now so I'm not sure what is controversial about it.
Unless he is saying that Kane is better than prime Aguero which is bollocks and so far from reality that I weep a little inside.
Oh, I agree. If he said Kane has always been better then I would have been first in the queue to berate it.
But, today, his claim is accurate imo, but suspect he mentioned it because a few are still arguing to the contrary.
 
Totally missing my point. He may score goals but I have never ever seen him have a game where he has been the best player on the pitch. Yes he scores goals but his overall game has never impressed me, it’s my opinion. The rags had Van Nistlerooy, who scored loads, but his overall game was also great. I remember watching him against Leverkusen (I think) and I have never seen a better centre forward performance. With Kane i just don’t see that. So you can quite and belittle me again but I really don’t care

All we want is him to score goals let the rest team do the rest
 
Going to get absolutely, categorically crucified for saying this (I'd expect no less as this is a Man City forum) but Kane is better than Agüero.
Not at present, purely based on the goals stats. In 19 goals time he will over take Aguero in the PL scoring ranks, and could very go on to be all time PL scorer, especially if he comes here. He's only got 13 fewer assists than Aguero, too. What he doesn't have, however, is a goal in 93:20 to secure a title - yet..
 
The only ones that think that are those that think Soriano, Khaldoon , Berrada are profligate and reckless with our finances.I don't.
True but the more you spend the bigger the risk. And i was responding to urban genies post where he was trying to define why so many blues are not keen on Kane. .

I am pretty confident that if we paid £80m for him those in favour of him joining would be over 80%, but given most blues think Spurs are going to want significantly more than £100m taht figure is going to drop alot.
 
All valid points but I don’t want Kane as I have never seen him play and thought “my god he is world class”. There are forwards who you think, yeah he is special, like Sergio, Kane is not one of them. Granted I don’t watch him a lot and if we get him I may be wrong but it’s a no from me.

Pretty much this. And at the money he would cost, he Should be universally seen as world class.

I don't get why people get so upset at someone just not rating a player as much as they do. I don't 'hate' him, I'm certainly in no way 'hostile' to him, nowhere near the level of some of the reactions to opinions of him.

At the end of the day, the club will decide if he is the right player (might seems
they already have that he is), and if he is the right price (let's see how that plays out). Is my or anyone else's agreeing/disagreeing woth either or both of the above really that significant?
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.