Harry Kane

[give it to gordon]

Kane had a huge choice to make;

stay at spurs , maybe win a cup or 2 (and its a BIG maybe) and go down as a total spurs legend. Carry on being england skipper.
or
Leave for a team that challenges in all comps yearly, collect medals galore, and go down as a prem league legend and carry on being england skipper.

has he got the balls to make that decision??

I thought he made that decision a year ago or so by signing a new long term contract with spurs.

 

[Semper aggressus]

Whilst he’s undoubtedly a great striker now, given his age and injury record for what he’d cost I don’t think it would make much sense to sign him. If we did we’d be having to buy another top striker in about three years.

If we have the money for Kane then we must be able to afford Haaland who would be just as good and for much longer.

 

[The slaughtered lamb]

There's no point wasting time with Kane. Levy is a wind-up merchant. He will demand too much money for a player who is fantastic, despite his injury record. But Levy will never sell to another PL club. We need to focus on a more realistic target like Haaland who, despite his agent, seems to want to come to City.

He’d be a great signing, but I know what you mean and it’s an important consideration. Doing business with anyone for their top players won’t be easy, but Levy is akin to Di Laurentis. Last thing we need is negotiations going down to the wire and Levy deciding at the 12th hour, he’d rather sell next year. And different to the Walker situation because he was pushing for a move and had been frozen out by Poch.

 

[01cravend]

Whilst he’s undoubtedly a great striker now, given his age and injury record for what he’d cost I don’t think it would make much sense to sign him. If we did we’d be having to buy another top striker in about three years.

If we have the money for Kane then we must be able to afford Haaland who would be just as good and for much longer.

That's the thing, you don't know Haaland will be just as good as Kane is in the Premier League. Also we wouldn't have to buy a striker to replace Kane because he's 31, he doesn't rely on pace and has shown in his Tottenham role now that he can adapt his game and still thrive.

Think it comes down to weighing up Kane's risk of injury vs Haaland's risk of adapting.

 

[Bluesince1979]

I thought he made that decision a year ago or so by signing a new long term contract with spurs.

Doesnt mean a lot really.
with his quote last month of “ill decide my future after the euros”.... hes having a little flirt with other clubs i reckon

 

[foden47]

Once again Kane shows his quality when it comes to finishing.

I am sure the anti Kane brigade will soon be on complaining about his injury record, age and the fact they hate him.

For me if we sign him, then the trophies will keep rolling in.

 

[hgblue]

Once again Kane shows his quality when it comes to finishing.

I am sure the anti Kane brigade will soon be on complaining about his injury record, age and the fact they hate him.

For me if we sign him, then the trophies will keep rolling in.

I’m gobsmacked people can’t see how brilliant he is, he’d break every record going if he played for us.

 

[Barcon]

Once again Kane shows his quality when it comes to finishing.

I am sure the anti Kane brigade will soon be on complaining about his injury record, age and the fact they hate him.

For me if we sign him, then the trophies will keep rolling in.

They'll keep rolling in regardless mate.

 

[foden47]

They'll keep rolling in regardless mate.

Maybe they will, but I am more convinced that signing Kane would guarantee they will

 

[citizen_maine]

Once again Kane shows his quality when it comes to finishing.

I am sure the anti Kane brigade will soon be on complaining about his injury record, age and the fact they hate him.

For me if we sign him, then the trophies will keep rolling in.

I'm pretty sure the trophies will keep rolling in no matter who we sign