Harry Kane

[elbearos]

1961. I’d pipe down.

And they bought that team!

 

[bavarian blue]

Chelsea pal of mine would rather have Kane than Lukaku, but no way would Spurs sanction that.

 

[Cobwebcat]

I guess the signing a 6 year deal part is his own fault at the end of the day, gentlemen's agreement or not.

True but that article is way off.

 

[Nightmare Walking]

"given his best"

has he?

I would say so. He's never lacked effort.

 

[Matt Diablo]

Some things are best left unsaid.

Damo no just no

 

[BlueDejong]

I don't understand the Haaland fanboys...

 

[HaalandEffect]

Kane is not worth more than Lukaku.

 

[Phil1]

I don't understand the Haaland fanboys...

What is a fan boy in this context? Someone who'd like to sign him?
Someone who copies his hairstyle? Dress sense? Willing to name their first child after him? I need to know these things before I place myself in the fan boy category.

 

[Phil Mitchell Foden]

Personally I think people get far too invested in single transfers. I've seen it year on year on Bluemoon and it is very rare that the players we miss out on goes on to have the impact that they are supposed to have. I keep referring to this because it is probably the best example. We signed Gundo the summer Pogba went to United and some people on here had a minor meltdown because Pogba was the only player on the planet who could replace Yaya. In football things just don't work like that.

Haaland won't stop us continuing to win PL titles regularly or get to the latter stages of the CL regularly. Missing out on a player is irrelevant when you're run as well as we are and you have a squad as good as ours.

Two names: Van Persie and Hazard.

Missing out on them saw United win a title they'd otherwise have had no hope of winning, and saw Chelsea rebuild themselves into a title winning side again.

I think Haaland will have a similar impact for whoever he joins, and I really fear we'll live to regret standing idly by and allowing him to join a rival, in preference of Kane.

 

[BillyShears]

Two names: Van Persie and Hazard.

Missing out on them saw United win a title they'd otherwise have had no hope of winning, and saw Chelsea rebuild themselves into a title winning side again.

I think Haaland will have a similar impact for whoever he joins, and I really fear we'll live to regret standing idly by and allowing him to join a rival, in preference of Kane.

I'm not afraid of him going anywhere and I don't agree with those examples. Neither of those players to my mind have massively impacted what City went on to do. We lost the title in 12/13 because of Mancini.