Harry Kane

I think he means that we set a precedent. Whereas if we had of transferred Kane first we may have got him for the rumoured £100m.

What he does not take into account is the release clause. Jack was easier to get done. If dozy Charlie had of put a clause into Harry’s contact he would be a city player now.
 
Kane.
Grealish.
Stones.
Walker.
Foden.
Sterling.

Half the England team.

You know it makes sense.(for Kane)
 
I think he means that we set a precedent. Whereas if we had of transferred Kane first we may have got him for the rumoured £100m.

What he does not take into account is the release clause. Jack was easier to get done. If dozy Charlie had of put a clause into Harry’s contact he would be a city player now.

But we offered 100m first for Kane and it was refused straight away!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.