For so many it is the truth and needs to be discussed, I'd love Kane to sign but I'd be over the Bluemoon if we landed Haaland
What needs to be discussed?
For so many it is the truth and needs to be discussed, I'd love Kane to sign but I'd be over the Bluemoon if we landed Haaland
It has been discussed, many many times. It's getting boring now. Of course most fans would of picked Haaland but Pep wants Kane. Simple as.For so many it is the truth and needs to be discussed, I'd love Kane to sign but I'd be over the Bluemoon if we landed Haaland
No, are you?You should use a smiley of some description when making sarcastic remarks.
You were being sarcastic, were you not?
Bangs head against door...It has been discussed, many many times. It's getting boring now. Of course most fans would of picked Haaland but Pep wants Kane. Simple as.
The old mobile hotdog cart! Great memories, be sure your sins will find you out...that has stuck with me for many years from the holy man outside Maine rd. Horseshit, the tiny souvenir shop and the mighty climb up to the kippax, what I'd give for one more match day of thatIt was real gravy in those tins. And those watery onions?
Bliss, man. I still remember the old hot dog carts the guys used to wheel around the ground.
Life seemed so much happier and simpler then (for me, anyway!)
managed and rotated? when we have paid £150m and have no other recognised striker available? If we get him for £100m then fine but £120 to 160m is silly money for Kane. Sure we might be able to afford it , but the more we spend on Kane the more it will hamper our strengthening in other areas.He does get injured yes, as does every other player, but the difference is at Spurs he’s constantly rushed back, with us he would be properly managed and rotated, and looking at his Premier League appearances and goals I reckon he’s doing alright for someone that’s injury prone
Which one, Immanuel or Facking?You're in the wrong thread, you want the one on Kant.
It is V, very tastyV I M T O