Harry Kane

[Ajm1985]

Spurs are apparently after a double deal for Vlahovic and Milenkovic from Fiorentina. If they actually get those players to agree to go, and offer enough (valuations could be different), it may see movement on Kane.

 

[blue ranger]

Alternatives such as...

Luka Jovic?

 

[richards30]

Luka Jovic?

There is defo a top player in there mate as we have seen in the past?

 

[Sky Blue]

Could you please provide names and potential transfer prices for a striker out there who can match, or has matched Kane's current record?

Thanks.

McTxiki has gone quiet on that one, Pidge.

 

[BlueMedic]

Unpopular opinion I imagine, but I'm fairly accepting of the idea of having a "bad" season, then go into next season in a stronger position to negotiate deals for a top striker (also opens the unlikely opportunity of Haaland).

Spending £250m on Grealish and Kane for me could come back to bite us significantly going forward.

 

[MarsLlama]

Somebody posted here Felix + cash ~ Bernardo exchange.

Lmao.

If when we were trying to replace Kompany I said we should go for Kimpembe + cash + player I'd rightly be laughed out of the room.

 

[MadchesterCity]

It’s Daniel Levy doing what he does best, which is being a bell end. He always ends up selling, but he typically gets the deal he wants.

He will always add 20% on to the price he wants, knowing he will be negotiated down on the upfront, and have the total built up with add-ons.

I posted on here a few years back that I’d been in a boardroom with him, and I don’t trust him at all. In my case we were pitching a £1.2m outsource, it was all priced, negotiated, budgeted for, and ready for signature, then he got involved at the 11th hour.

We went down to London to to meet him and some of the Exec and he basically told us he wanted the contract at £750k, but couldn’t justify why apart from “that was his price”.

We just left, withdrew our proposal, and focussed on closing a couple of deals outside of football that were less high profile but more profitable.

Just grade A arrogance on his behalf, other member of his Exec who had worked on the deal for 6 months looked shocked, so he clearly didn’t loop them in on what he was planning to say.

My personal opinion on this is that City will give him an ultimatum, and pull out if he doesn’t agree to it. I don’t think we are likely to be bossed by him, our Exec team want full control.

And when we do.... Ring ring is that Haaland?
"City fans rejoice"

Aaaaah in my world

 

[CityBluez]

Lmao.

If when we were trying to replace Kompany I said we should go for Kimpembe + cash + player I'd rightly be laughed out of the room.

Why?

 

[blueparrot]

Unpopular opinion I imagine, but I'm fairly accepting of the idea of having a "bad" season, then go into next season in a stronger position to negotiate deals for a top striker (also opens the unlikely opportunity of Haaland).

Spending £250m on Grealish and Kane for me could come back to bite us significantly going forward.

If not Kane and you think Haaland unlikely, negotiate deals for which top striker?

 

[Blue back home]

Do Spurs need a left back and centre half? How about 100m plus Ake and Mendy? That would free up wages to cover Kane. Pretty sure Spurs would be up for that, it’s a big win win deal.