Chelsea wanted Lukaku, Lukaku wanted Chelsea. He wasn't going anywhere else. Take all the break you need. We wouldn't have magically forced Lukaku to join, he had no interest playing for us.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
kun
Well-Known Member
It’s like Kane. Chelsea couldn’t sign him because Kane had no interest in Chelsea.Chelsea wanted Lukaku, Lukaku wanted Chelsea. He wasn't going anywhere else. Take all the break you need. We wouldn't have magically forced Lukaku to join, he had no interest playing for us.
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
That isn’t true. He played the game: I’m happy at Inter and I don’t want to leave. Which is what you do until you leave. It was always bullshit. And it was clear he was going to leave for the amount of money the market valued him, given the situation Inter is in. Unless you have some quote telling me he specifically said he didn’t want to play alongside his best friend from the Belgium national team but would for Chelsea.Lukaku made it very clear, very early, that he wasn't interested in City.
But people love telling themselves narratives otherwise. I bet the Txiki out drafts are loading up again.Lukaku made it very clear, very early, that he wasn't interested in City.
citytill1die84
Well-Known Member
The fact some people cannot come to grips with this or the fact that Haaland isn't available this window is quite astonishing honestly, rarely seen weird meltdowns around transfers of this magnitude.It’s like Kane. Chelsea couldn’t sign him because Kane had no interest in Chelsea.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 5,491
- Team supported
- Manchester City
i like this news so I choose to believe only this, thank you
D
D
Deleted member 87819
Guest
Chelsea wanted Lukaku, Lukaku wanted Chelsea. He wasn't going anywhere else. Take all the break you need. We wouldn't have magically forced Lukaku to join, he had no interest playing for us.
You can tell yourself that all you want but it’s not true. Chelsea tried to make Haaland work, they couldn’t reach an agreement with Dortmund, and quickly worked a deal that made Inter happy, which we, too, could have done in a matter of days if we wanted.
Saying he had no interest in playing for us specifically is bullshit of the highest level. If you go to his thread, people there truly believed he wouldn’t want to leave Inter after a happy season for anybody. Obviously that was never the case
This isn't from Martin Blackburn fwiw, so even though it's better news AND from The Sun I'm sceptical.
Might be coming from Kane's camp though.
You seem to regard this as a victory. I am not sure disrespecting your main player is really such a smart move. I don't see why you would identify so strongly with the management of Levy.You’re struggling to grasp grealish is now a city player whereas Kane isn’t
A transfer that’s been in the works longer than grealish still can’t be agreed, despite a load of you saying it’s already a done deal.