Harry Kane

[TheThirdDeano]

Still find that slightly hard to believe.

Would Kane not be more important than signing Grealish?

I always though city briefed that Kane was priority, bernardo would make way for grealish.

what ever happened to that?

 

[blue61]

I like your theory but I'm just amazed we don't have any backup options in place. For all we know there may well be, but with nine days left in the window it's not looking like it

Quite simple really there isn't any available that would improve the squad within the budget

I like your theory but I'm just amazed we don't have any backup options in place. For all we know there may well be, but with nine days left in the window it's not looking like it

 

[Keeper!]

I always though city briefed that Kane was priority, bernardo would make way for grealish.

what ever happened to that?

No sensible offers for Bernardo?

 

[Keeper!]

And what of these special funds set aside for "special" players like Messi.

Does Kane and the need for a striker not fall in to that category?

 

[Keeper!]

Quite simple really there isn't any available that would improve the squad within the budget

we have a 100m budget and no one out there?


Here is a scenario, go to PSG, offer 100m cash for Mbappe, tell the player sign for us and in two years you can leave for the same fee with our blessing.

 

[TheThirdDeano]

No sensible offers for Bernardo?

Maybe, but why did the priorities change

 

[Keeper!]

Maybe, but why did the priorities change

Prioritise all you like and plan but if clubs can't find or don't have the cash, we can't sell our assets.

 

[blueparrot]

And what of these special funds set aside for "special" players like Messi.

Does Kane and the need for a striker not fall in to that category?

There were no funds set aside for Messi, there were sponsorship deals set aside for Messi so no Kane doesnt fall into that. Besides nobody has ever said we can’t afford Kane. We
Robably alway knew it would take most of the window to get a fee we were happy to pay agreed.

 

[Keeper!]

There were no funds set aside for Messi, there were sponsorship deals set aside for Messi so no Kane doesnt fall into that. Besides nobody has ever said we can’t afford Kane. We
Robably alway knew it would take most of the window to get a fee we were happy to pay agreed.

So the captain of England would not attract sponsorship , maybe no where near Messi levels but there must be some interest?

 

[blueparrot]

Maybe, but why did the priorities change

They haven’t Grealish was easy Kane isn’t, if we ‘d have waited to get Kane done and ran out of time for a player with a release that would have been stupid. Besides we needed Grealish in quicker to cover for KDB and Foden. Kane will take as long as it takes or we might not get him. Grealish has no bearing on it.