DrBlueBob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2008
- Messages
- 6,536
- Team supported
- Need you ask?
Stop digging. It's unedifying. Plus why is it obvious? In your mind maybe, that's where it should stay.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
T
T
Tony - MCFC
Guest
Truly hope notCR7 incoming.
Why? He would do a job for us and would throughly piss off united. Win win imoTruly hope not
I wouldn't mind himCR7 incoming.
applecentral
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 5 May 2011
- Messages
- 1,562
I respect your opinion.Truly hope not
DrBlueBob
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jul 2008
- Messages
- 6,536
- Team supported
- Need you ask?
He's ex Utd, I don't know if that has any bearing.So how come when we were sniffing round he says he was happy at inter but when Chelsea can looking he jumped at the chance . Not everyone wants to come to city mate .
Up until Chelsea coming in he was saying he was happy at inter and didn’t want to move but hdd we had unfinished business at Chelsea and I think that’s what swung it . If we had any inkling he wanted to come we would have moved for him .Is this really true.
Was there any news about this ?
citizen_maine
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 May 2011
- Messages
- 14,109
won't be CR7 if he doesCR7 incoming.
balotelli's back pocket
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Jan 2016
- Messages
- 8,664
We can spend the rest of the window trying to get the price down, but at this point we need to do the deal. We know it, Pep knows it, you better believe Levy knows it.
If Spurs really needed to sell Kane, financially speaking, I think they would have done so already (see Inter and Lukaku). For all the talk of transfers, they've only spent about 20 million this summer.
From their perspective, selling Kane leaves them with no hope of Champions League football next season, and they can't get anyone decent in with the money because nobody wants to go there.
I don't think that's a deal breaker - if it was off, we'd know. But it does mean, IMO, that Levy will hold out for his asking price. Either he keeps Kane, or he softens the blow by making us overpay.
I still believe we'll end up paying 150m with all the add ons. What concerns me is that at the moment it feels less like a negotiation and more like a staring contest.
Both sides seem to think they have the other over a barrel, but there's only one club that actually expects to win things. That's why we have to blink first.
Especially after passing on Lukaku and Messi, which would probably have been easier deals to do.
If Spurs really needed to sell Kane, financially speaking, I think they would have done so already (see Inter and Lukaku). For all the talk of transfers, they've only spent about 20 million this summer.
From their perspective, selling Kane leaves them with no hope of Champions League football next season, and they can't get anyone decent in with the money because nobody wants to go there.
I don't think that's a deal breaker - if it was off, we'd know. But it does mean, IMO, that Levy will hold out for his asking price. Either he keeps Kane, or he softens the blow by making us overpay.
I still believe we'll end up paying 150m with all the add ons. What concerns me is that at the moment it feels less like a negotiation and more like a staring contest.
Both sides seem to think they have the other over a barrel, but there's only one club that actually expects to win things. That's why we have to blink first.
Especially after passing on Lukaku and Messi, which would probably have been easier deals to do.
BlueRockape
Well-Known Member
The only thing that makes me think it may happen .It’s just not going to happen is it
Is if Kane had a gentleman's agreement he doesn't seem to be the type of man to let that go