Can we stop saying stuff like this, nothing has been agreed end of. Something might happen before the window closes but all this makes zero sense.
Yes, it's because they couldn't afford it on one player at the time. They aren't paying £100m for a 29 year old Kane, with less than 2 years left on his contract, not a hope in hellI completely disagree.
Chances are this season Kane will still be in the Top 3 goal scorers in the league. United not wanting pay 100m for a 21 year old is pretty self explanatory.
Nnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy I`m not having that.Mr Ed :)
so that means we are not allowed to comment on anything whatsoever unless we're ITK's? why have a thread then? waste of 3000 pages, really
we got 4m less than the winners, chelsea may add another 30m in sponsor bonuses, so how does that pay for ronaldo,it doesnt,is the answer, same as shirt sales, made up bollox so things sit easier in our minds.Yeah, for someone of that ability.
If we win the CL it’ll pay for itself.
Charlie Kane is the one to direct the abuse at, he was the one spouting crap at his wedding.Clemmie Moodie must be pissing her sides with her 'exclusive' a few weeks ago. A real get my name in the news story if ever there was one