No bastard.Who cares
No bastard.Who cares
I think you signed Grealish because Pep likes him. There is no real footballing justification for signing him. More like a gift from the owners to Pep.
Is he going to be the next CR7?
No.
Is he better than KDB?
No.
Does he get more goals/assists than Sterling?
No.
Is he an improvement on Foden?
Dunno?
Do City need him?
No.
Does he half nice calves?
Yes.
Will he sell stuff?
Yes.
Does he make Pep happy?
Yes.
He’s been playing at a struggling club so he hasn’t had the chance to be most of the things you’ve listed aboveI think you signed Grealish because Pep likes him. There is no real footballing justification for signing him. More like a gift from the owners to Pep.
Is he going to be the next CR7?
No.
Is he better than KDB?
No.
Does he get more goals/assists than Sterling?
No.
Is he an improvement on Foden?
Dunno?
Do City need him?
No.
Does he half nice calves?
Yes.
Will he sell stuff?
Yes.
Does he make Pep happy?
Yes.
AP McCoy used to race in GREEN & GOLDI like it when TH comes out with a crisp comment like this.
Was their a chance we were in for him last summer and they didn’t want us to get him so they brought him insteadI'm still waiting for Donny van de Beek to let us know he exists.
Donny Von DeBenchHaha. I used to be a regular in the hospitality box of a certain City supporting ex world champion boxer - he regularly used to take the piss out of his brother (also a boxer) by saying he should start getting his sponsors to print their ads on the bottom of his boxing boots due to their level of exposure whilst being down on the canvas... I reckon something similar could be marketable for Donny 'The Bench' Van De Beek
He used KDB as the example to which I said I’d tell him to mind his own fucking business (as he just signed a new contract which takes him to 34).
The post was from a rag twat what else would you expect?He’s been playing at a struggling club so he hasn’t had the chance to be most of the things you’ve listed above
A truly bitter and clueless post
No. He’s not correct in that at all.He did say "KDB and other players", and my reply said that Sterling was a better example as he was negotiating now. I'm the one you told to "give my head a wobble" for making exactly the same point as you did about Sterling.
Ultimately, isn't the point that the OP made; that a high Haaland wage would push up other players wages (even if it was due to an artificially low fee) correct (even if he'd have been better not focusing on KDB)?