Harry Kane

Really poor to say this has rumbled on for almost 2 months.

I don’t think the board or management could be blamed for failing to get him. Ultimately, he’s under contract at another club who can decide whether and at what price to sell. If that report is to be believed, it’s their loss. He’s simply not worth over £120m.

City should have got the message earlier though. We wanted to be “aggressive” this window. I feel like there’s an aspect of moving on quickly and being ruthless that’s missing. That we wanted him was the worst kept secret. We didn’t move on to other targets (at least publicly) and ended up looking a bit desperate
 
Wonder if we are seeing a bit of ‘post Pep’ playing out here. Pep wants Kane as he wants to have another go at the champions league and is only interested in his last two years. Beyond two years is not his problem, so age and cost not in his thinking. The board supporting Pep are willing to go to a certain amount to get him, but have their own ceiling. If Pep is off in two years which is looking likely then the board would prefer a younger ‘project’ that will serve us ‘post pep’ and a new manager. Pep also mentioned about the future in one of his statements. Just think the board are looking longer term now with purchases.
 
Really are some bellends on this forum. One suggestion of Kane not joining and they lay into the club, the club and people that have brought you 3 league titles and multiple trophies in the last 4 years. Like spoilt fucking children.
It beggars belief mate, it really does
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.