Harry Kane

Come on Bobby Boy, shouldn't take that long or are you embarrassed by your clubs achievements over the last two decades? Especially with the divisions top scorer and goal provider, and the genius that is Levy.
 
If there’s one thing players need to learn from the last two years, both Kane and Messi, it is that a gentlemanly agreement is worth shit. If you sign a contract and think you might want to leave in the future you will insert a release clause with exact price and terms.
 
Citizen of Legoland said:
Completely wrong. The reason this fell down is that Spurs cannot attract a decent enough replacement because they're playing at an embarassing level in Europe and no self-respecting player wants to choose to be a part of that. "Yay, we won a trophy against the best that Latvia can throw at us", that's if they even win it of course. City gave them time but it was clear it wasn't going to happen. If Levy can sell a player for £125M and replace them with one for £40M with the situation there, he'd do it in a heartbeat, as any owner/director should be doing.
Click to expand...
I don't believe this at all. No buying club paying £100m+ for a player does everything on the selling clubs terms. Its fanciful at best to suggest we were trying to a deal of this magnitude, with the attitude that we would hang fire for weeks on end while Spurs tried to find a replacement. We might have done something like this with Villa for Grealish but did so knowing that with the buyout clause, Villa couldn't turn round and kibosh the deal.

We have walked away because we are not willing to meet the asking price, an asking price that by all accounts hasn't changed for weeks. We thought Spurs would lower their demands. Spurs thought we would increase our offer. Both wrong.
 
give it to gordon said:
I dont think its poor from City. More like levy knows his player wants to leave. Levy knows City needs a centre forward. Levy wants an over the top price because of this. Levy thinks City are so rich he ups the price.
City refuse to pay over the top.
So levy keeps an unhappy player and loses around 130million.
City dont buy from spurs.
You cant make a deal if one side doesnt want to make one !
Click to expand...
This is my point though, Kane is a transfer virgin, his agent is nothing. City, as the professionals, with a whole team of people working on this for months should have been in the position to tell the player we are no where near here, this isn't happening, don't go burning bridges. Instead they led to him believe it was possible when it just wasn't.
 
TonyColemansbagofapples said:
You seem to know a lot about our dealings. We pulled out of the Koulibaly deal because, like Kane, the other teams chairman is a greedy twat as well as a smartarse.
Watch my lips carefully..."City will offer a sensible price for our targets and pull out if said target is over-priced (in our opinion)". As a result we have won more trophies in the last eighteen months than the entire reign of Levy's spell as chairman.
Twenty years he's led your club and I'll let you tell me what you've won. Ok, over to you.
Click to expand...
That's the way a million transfers that never happened played out. 2 years in a row you have been involved in very public transfers that never had a chance of happening because the clubs where so far a part. If club A is not willing to get anywhere near club B's valuation then it should end with a thanks for taking my call and never get anywhere the news.

And can you all stop with the myth that Tottenham fans think Levy is some kind of hero. We are aware of the many errors he has made. Danny Rose walked the out for free, he turned down 50m for him and he barely kicked a ball for us after that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.