Harry Kane

I did chuckle to myself when ITV used a zoom lense from way up in the stands to focus solely on Harry's face in the England line-up whilst the bugler was playing the last post.
 
we have players that can do the intricate one touch passing and its beautiful to watch and i wouldnt want it changed . But sometimes we just need a player that runs direct at a defence ,with pace, with the ball. We have the ability to move a defence around and create space for that type of player. Somebody mentioned Haaland doesn't score many headers that maybe true, but we are a side that doesnt put that many "headable" crosses in either,something that Kane would suffer from as well.
Haaland in sky blue bearing down on goal is something i would like to see, and i am sure not many prem defenders would !
 
There is surely no way this transfer is happening in January. I would prefer him over Vlahovic given their differing levels of pedigree but he can't be considered the solution at this stage by the club!
 
The Kane hate on here really puzzles me. He's clearly a very, very good striker.

If I was looking for a medium mileage Ferrari and you quoted me a stupid price, I wouldn't want to buy it. But I'd still love the car. And, if the price became cheap, I'd reconsider. If we could get Kane for 40-50 million quid, for arguments sake, how many out there would still not want him at City?
I think a few people have got themselves so invested in other strikers they see signing Kane as some kind of failure by the club and get themselves worked up about it. That blinds them from seeing Kane as the player he is.
My opinion is, he isn't my personal first choice, I'd put him at maybe 3 or 4 on my list. The difference is I realise there is a lot of aspects to a transfer the club consider, some of which we can't know anything about. So if the club decide they think Kane is our best available /affordable option, I fine with that and confident he'd score goals,a lot of goals.
 
I think a few people have got themselves so invested in other strikers they see signing Kane as some kind of failure by the club and get themselves worked up about it. That blinds them from seeing Kane as the player he is.
My opinion is, he isn't my personal first choice, I'd put him at maybe 3 or 4 on my list. The difference is I realise there is a lot of aspects to a transfer the club consider, some of which we can't know anything about. So if the club decide they think Kane is our best available /affordable option, I fine with that and confident he'd score goals,a lot of goals.
Far too sensible & well thought out post for any thread on the transfer forum my friend.
 
I have a question for all those saying BIg No to getting Kane in January!

Lets say we managed to sign him, why are you all so sure he will fail? Shouldn't we give him a chance and maybe, just maybe he will be great for us?
This is the single most bizarre thread in the history of the Transfer Forum imo. I think it's clear we tried to sign Kane and it's clear that he wanted to come. It's also clear he's a top quality striker with an eye for goal. Yet poster after poster wants to criticise/insult/belittle Kane, despite the possibility that we could still be in for him. Very strange.
 
This is the single most bizarre thread in the history of the Transfer Forum imo. I think it's clear we tried to sign Kane and it's clear that he wanted to come. It's also clear he's a top quality striker with an eye for goal. Yet poster after poster wants to criticise/insult/belittle Kane, despite the possibility that we could still be in for him. Very strange.

It’s the transfer junkies (mostly fans based overseas). Many of them don’t post on other sections of the forum. They’re just obsessed with transfers. Bizarre when you consider the team/squad we have.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.