Could be Kane is rushed back at Spurs , he will be given time to fully recover and manage his ankle injuries , as for the £100m its stupid money in this economic climate and he will not have a sell on value if he signs for five seasons , not sure our owners would go for that , but as a fan , its not my money :)I have reservations about Kane. £100 million + is a lot of money to spend on a 28 year old with regular injury issues.
He probably would have been on the benchNot even Harry Kane could have saved that shit show of decision making by Pep.
Sell on value is nonsenseCould be Kane is rushed back at Spurs , he will be given time to fully recover and manage his ankle injuries , as for the £100m its stupid money in this economic climate and he will not have a sell on value if he signs for five seasons , not sure our owners would go for that , but as a fan , its not my money :)
Any football club even with pots of money will consider the overall costs of purchasing a player , sell on values would be a big part of the decisionSell on value is nonsense
Grealish and Haaland is all we need for his summer. If it takes £250m so be it!I’d rather get Jack Grealish, I think we need more dynamism in midfield to break down these defensive teams, besides KDB is 30 next and Gundogan will be 32
PLease dont!GET HIM IN.