Harry Kane

Of all the short-term, short-sighted signings in history this'd be the shortest. 90 m. for two years of Kane vs. 150 m. for ten years of Haaland. It's not that difficult.
 
He's 27. A bit of a **** but we'd dominate the league for the next few years with him and KDB

Don't see it happening though
 
kun said:
Me too but what if Haaland wants to play elsewhere?
Click to expand...
We need to be at least in for him or Kane. Either would improve us massively. If they choose elsewhere, fair enough, but we need a big boy statement in attack. KDB feeding Kane or Haaland would be unfair.

Mbappe might be going Madrid or Liverpool, Kane must want trophies and Poch is at PSG, but Madrid have been linked previously. Obviously Haaland’s Dad played for us, so hopefully he wouldn’t want to go to the Rags. Juve could be in the mix but they’ve spent a ton on Ronaldo. Chelsea have just spent 300mil in a short frame of time so they’re probably dependent on top 4 before they make any big signings. Barca are skint and Haaland doesn’t seem like a Barca player. Munich could go for Haaland but Lewandowski has a few years left. There’s definitely room in the market for us to get one of the 3, with Haaland most likely and Mbappe the least, but we need to be decisive.
 
AliBobbyJ said:
Of all the short-term, short-sighted signings in history this'd be the shortest. 90 m. for two years of Kane vs. 150 m. for ten years of Haaland. It's not that difficult.
Click to expand...
Stop it. That is not short sighted, kane is one of the best footballers and still has a lot to offer, he is not the quickest so he doesn’t rely on speed and he actually has a good football brain unlike a certain robot striker
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.