Because he would be terrible value for money. Thats the main reason people dont want him I think.People passing up on Kane is ridiculous. 28 years old. 160 prem goals and unlike other strikers he isn’t built on speed etc. He’s similar to Lewandowksi who’s about 34 now and is in his absolute peak. Kane will be similar to that I think. So your looking at another 6 years of Kane scoring 20-30 goals a season. Haaland would be the preferred choice of course but Kane would be a unbelievable signing
But if you get 5/6 years of a top quality striker which I doubt he would drop his level. Then after that time £100 million doesn’t seem too bad?Because he would be terrible value for money. Thats the main reason people dont want him I think.
£100m+ for 28 year old striker does not make any financial sense.
Lewandowski’s injury history isn’t like Kane’sPeople passing up on Kane is ridiculous. 28 years old. 160 prem goals and unlike other strikers he isn’t built on speed etc. He’s similar to Lewandowksi who’s about 34 now and is in his absolute peak. Kane will be similar to that I think. So your looking at another 6 years of Kane scoring 20-30 goals a season. Haaland would be the preferred choice of course but Kane would be a unbelievable signing
The only way people can make an argument for wanting Kane is if they pretend hes the only option and he's not.
I think you are being pretty disingenuous.
Kane is a better all round player than Haaland currently, so of course there is an argument for wanting Kane above him.
Its a pretty awful argument given the context of Kane being 28, having 7 ankle injuries in 4 years and Levy demanding far more money for him.
Yes, his lisp would be the reason he wouldn’t fit in. Of course.No chance he’ll fit in. too old injury prone and can’t even speak
A lisp is a speech defect. He's just too thick to manage a coherent and cogent sentence without a good dose of "errrrrrrr" thrown in.Yes, his lisp would be the reason he wouldn’t fit in. Of course.