Lavinda Past
Well-Known Member
If Danny Ings doesn't come, they'll probably be expecting us to sign Charlie Austin instead...Wait, some people are actually serious about Ings?
That's fucking hysterical.
If Danny Ings doesn't come, they'll probably be expecting us to sign Charlie Austin instead...Wait, some people are actually serious about Ings?
That's fucking hysterical.
Parklife!If Danny Ings doesn't come, they'll probably be expecting us to sign Charlie Austin instead...
Once you take out penalties Jesus' minutes per goal hasn't been that different to Kane's.Kane may have a better minutes to goal ratio and can certainly take a penalty. However, is it worth paying £100m+ (less what we could get for Jesus) for that and lose a player who is near as damn it perfect for the pressing game we play? Especially when many on here think Gabby is worth next to fuck all.
Totally get your point, but our club cannot just discount Kane's penalty record. It's above average and Jesus' is very much below average. You want your top striker to be taking penalties and you want to be confident they will put it into the back of the net. I get that it skews stats like that, however.Once you take out penalties Jesus' minutes per goal hasn't been that different to Kane's.
Gabriel Jesus : 123 starts plus 72 as a substitute. 82 goals. Pretty decent record in my eyes. I reckon that equates to a very good minutes to goal ratio.
We can only dream!If Danny Ings doesn't come, they'll probably be expecting us to sign Charlie Austin instead...
Sure - but Kane's penalty record is similar to Gundogan - 86% to 85%, with Kev not far behind on 80% (which is one less penalty scored every 2-3 years). It's handy having extra penalty takers on the pitch, but it's hardly a £100m bonus.Totally get your point, but our club cannot just discount Kane's penalty record. It's above average and Jesus' is very much below average. You want your top striker to be taking penalties and you want to be confident they will put it into the back of the net. I get that it skews stats like that, however.
Better with Steve AustinIf Danny Ings doesn't come, they'll probably be expecting us to sign Charlie Austin instead...
Well, we all know how much Steve Austin is worth anyway. His value hasn't changed over the decades.Better with Steve Austin