The Light Was Yellow Sir
Well-Known Member
If they spent it wisely, it might.And the cash would elevate them back into CL contention?
If they spent it wisely, it might.And the cash would elevate them back into CL contention?
It wouldn't work like that. It'd be more like if he scores X amount of goals City pays Y amount on top of base price. It'd be part of the add-on fees that could bring it up to the 140-160 range. It's not a new thing.He is trying it on expecting us to pay every time he scores , never heard of that one before
If tolmie or bill or anyone posts ITK stuff it goes tits up it doesn’t matter.Don’t get people on a forum reporting for being a piss take if it gets personally yep maybe
lol it’s not gonna be like that is it . Come on kaz it’s not a goal bonus . We pay him that lol.He is trying it on expecting us to pay every time he scores , never heard of that one before
I think a large part of the issue is that for the most part we have no effing idea who is posting in good faith. When that SuperSilva fella posted the other day I had no idea who they were.If tolmie or bill or anyone posts ITK stuff it goes tits up it doesn’t matter.
anyone else does it they get hounded and bullied off here.
very strange place on here.
ive been banned a few times for my own opinions on players.
had a post deleted last night for calling Messi a greedy shit lol
Not sure what specifically you're talking about, but if a rival fan keeps getting sly little digs in then 100% report it. If anyone wants to read crap like that, then just go on Twitter, that seems its raison d'être.
Sure a couple of them are ok.....but if we were spuds, selling Kane, and buying them, this place would have a melt down and half would literally be crying!Odsonne Édouard, £25M
Andrej Kramarić, £25M
Frank Kessié, £46M
Cristian Romero, £46M
Jerôme Boateng, free transfer
Andre Onana, £6M
I think a large part of the issue is that for the most part we have no effing idea who is posting in good faith. When that SuperSilva fella posted the other day I had no idea who they were.
to be fair he stated the obvious , kane deal was difficult and two were leaving , we knew thatYep I just checked his post history and though yep he knows stuff gets some right, most People don’t bother and jump on them and when one does it’s game on..
This is the case even when trying to sign KaneSure a couple of them are ok.....but if we were spuds, selling Kane, and buying them, this place would have a melt down and half would literally be crying!
IMO.....if Kane stayed and spuds spent 150m, they might challenge, but wouldn't make top 4 this season.I'm not saying it will or won't get done. I've just placed myself in Levy's stilettos, & this isn't merely about selling Kane. It's about how to replace his goals, & bolster the squad enough to challenge for a top 4 place, with a £150m budget?
Which players would you buy for £150m to achieve that aim?
If if someone had no posts or a few posts and they posted claiming to be ITK I’d take it with a pinch of salt same as tolmie etc. It’s all a bit of fun at the end of the day. People take it far to serious , and I’m someone who’s lost money on transfers from the info on this place and I would never ever report someone, over anything, it’s words on a screen ffs.Yep I just checked his post history and though yep he knows stuff gets some right, most People don’t bother and jump on them and when one does it’s game on..
to be fair he stated the obvious , kane deal was difficult and two were leaving , we knew that
Report doesn't mean we ban them. Report just means bring it to the mods attention.It doesn’t bother me because I see what it is! But if I press on report soon as I see a post that piss takes will he be banned straight away? If not not point..
Yes i saw that after , my point being it was nothing new what he said so there was a reactionRic confirmed he does know his stuff
I think far too little importance has been attached to Kane's clear and unequivocal admission that he wishes to come to City. It is unlikely, if not impossible, that he would have done so without City's approval and so we do have a moral obligation not to "hang him out to dry." The question remains, however, of how much Kane is worth: Levy says £160 million but City see that as (far?) too high. The answer would seem to be a fee plus add ons so that City get him for (somewhere near) what we think he's "worth" but if Kane proves he's worth more the fee rises towards Levy's figure. Since Kane wants to come to win trophies it seems reasonable that City pay more as his trophy count rises. Perhaps the payment for "easier" trophies could be higher than that for the CL! If Levy has come round to accepting such a deal in the last 48 hours then a deal can be made quite quickly, but I can't for the life of me see why it's taken him so long.Personally, yes. See it getting done.
City won't leave Kane hanging out to dry.
We've never done that yet to a player who is fully committed to joining us.
Yes i saw that after , my point being it was nothing new what he said so there was a reaction
If tolmie or bill or anyone posts ITK stuff it goes tits up it doesn’t matter.
anyone else does it they get hounded and bullied off here.
very strange place on here.
ive been banned a few times for my own opinions on players.
had a post deleted last night for calling Messi a greedy shit lol