Harry Kane

[Coatigan]

Spurs would be fucking mental to hang on to the last minute.

They will want to get the Kane money invested ASAP and build for the new season.

Do they? If anything I would think Levy wants the opposite. Sell him as late as he can to avoid spending most of it.

 

[Coatigan]

but city should quote sancho leaving dortmund for only £73 million plus add-ons ? his value was around £120million before covid-19 and last season turned down £100million.
lets lay down £80million for kane plus add-ons. so that can make the deal worth £120million in 5 to 8 years
even loan a player or 2 to spurs for a season like laporte and jesus

Dortmund refused 80m for sancho last summer. Some reported as far as 85m with addons. But that was as high as it got. His 'value' wasnt 120m, that was his asking price, and when utd refused to get close to it (I doubt Dortmund would have refused close to 100) they held onto him.

They will sell him this year for circa 75m, depending on reports (fucking 72.9m being the lowest, 79m being the highest ive seen).

Dortmund got their deal. They got less than they asked for ast year, but hardly any less than they would have got if they accepted an offer they didnt rate. And for as little as say 5m, as an average, Dortmund got a player if his quality for a year helping them win a cup and secure CL. They lost out on nothing at all, and showed they can be resolute.

 

[Great Kompany]

Dortmund refused 80m for sancho last summer. Some reported as far as 85m with addons. But that was as high as it got. His 'value' wasnt 120m, that was his asking price, and when utd refused to get close to it (I doubt Dortmund would have refused close to 100) they held onto him.

They will sell him this year for circa 75m, depending on reports (fucking 72.9m being the lowest, 79m being the highest ive seen).

Dortmund got their deal. They got less than they asked for ast year, but hardly any less than they would have got if they accepted an offer they didnt rate. And for as little as say 5m, as an average, Dortmund got a player if his quality for a year helping them win a cup and secure CL. They lost out on nothing at all, and showed they can be resolute.

Dortmund hands were tied in this case because of Sancho's unrelenting desire to move to rags. He would say Yes to nobody else. Hence the deal happened even a year later and imho a fair price.

But what's Harry Kane like. Does he really wanna stay at Spurs. Is he a guy with balls to agitate a move or a Euro win would be enough for him for all the playing years of his life. Does he has the balls to go ahead and say I know you are upset but I need this and I deserve this.

The Ashley Cole deal happened and he ended up winning it all. Scousers threatened Gerrard for the Chelsea transfer and he ended up not winning the PL.

These transfers need a one mind focussed commitment from players. If Kane wants to stay loyal and wants to be spurs best player or highest ever scorer. Fair play. Just don't be a woman and whine about not winning trophies. You know that at Spurs you won't. Live with that.

Same thing i said about Messi in the messi thread. If you love Barcelona just sign the fucking deal with whatever low wages they offer you. Bring them revenue for the next two years and help reduce their debt without complaining.
That's what you do for things you love. Not give interviews with Goal and refuse to sign an extension or a new contract.

 

[blue ranger]

its about the age and injuries for me. yes he is a very good striker and can play in all sorts of setups and lead the line but ? ok the but is the price or should i say the market value. spurs would want more than the £100million and if united are coming in the bidding room then spurs chairman can sit and wait and rub his hands

the thing for me is options there is options in the strikers world and 2 or 3 world class on the market.
haaland mbappe would be a option if we don't get kane. it maybe better value if we have to go over the £100 million with both aged at the early 20s but the gamble would be lack of premier league football being the unknown

but city should quote sancho leaving dortmund for only £73 million plus add-ons ? his value was around £120million before covid-19 and last season turned down £100million. so the market is covid-19 hit and clubs don't have the money
so why not play the game and claim we are struggling to find the money right now so use the add-ons as a way of getting more out of deals

lets lay down £80million for kane plus add-ons. so that can make the deal worth £120million in 5 to 8 years
even loan a player or 2 to spurs for a season like laporte and jesus

He is 27 years old, nearly 28. And the whole injury narrative is a myth. Look at the amount of games he has played consistently each season. I’d argue the biggest issue is that Tottenham probably have rushed him back. I’m not bothered what City pay, that’s up to Txiki but I think you are in cuckoo land if you think we are getting one of the best number 9s in world for £80m and add ons . Guess all we can do is wait and see.

 

[Thenumber1blue]

He is 27 years old, nearly 28. And the whole injury narrative is a myth. Look at the amount of games he has played consistently each season. I’d argue the biggest issue is that Tottenham probably have rushed him back. I’m not bothered what City pay, that’s up to Txiki but I think you are in cuckoo land if you think we are getting one of the best number 9s in world for £80m and add ins. Guess all we can do is wait and see.

And anyone is in cloud Cuckoo land if they think city will pay over 100 million against all their current transfer policies for a near 28 year old, with probably 2/3 top seasons left but will have to have a 5 year whopping contract

 

[Paul1970]

We lost 120m last season regardless, we are not poor but at the same time the events of the last 18 months have seriously effected football, including us.

Are we going to return to full stadiums and maintain them all season? big question mark still and the reason even the wealthy have to be careful about spending.

Sic no point in even thinking about haaland either .

 

[hammocity]

I’ve not seen any restaurants around here putting jellied eels on the menu, looks like it’s off.

Cockneys like a bit of liquor, looks like he's off to Las Vegas

 

[waspish]

And anyone is in cloud Cuckoo land if they think city will pay over 100 million against all their current transfer policies for a near 28 year old, with probably 2/3 top seasons left but will have to have a 5 year whopping contract

Thing with the transfer forum is we will find out either way in the next month! Personally think kane has 5 seasons at the very top especially if he moves to city because we will not play him with a slight injury we will get more out of him! If you think he has only 2/3 years if he contributes us winning the league next two seasons I’d settle for that now!

 

[Centurions]

Thing with the transfer forum is we will find out either way in the next month! Personally think kane has 5 seasons at the very top especially if he moves to city because we will not play him with a slight injury we will get more out of him! If you think he has only 2/3 years if he contributes us winning the league next two seasons I’d settle for that now!

Don't forget that in around a fortnight he'll be 28 so will be a near 29 year old.

 

[waspish]

Don't forget that in around a fortnight he'll be 28 so will be a near 29 year old.

Good point and in 10 year he will be useless and nearly 38!