Jokes on Kane though. Levy doesn't classify as a gentleman so that agreement is void.
There is no 10 year game changer so you buy what is on the market and you buy someone who is going to keep you at the top. Kane is that man.You could spin for the "Sun"
Didn't make them long term challengers did it?
Bet they wish they had bought a 10 year game changer instead.
100 million + for a 28 yr old with injury issues and no pace, and you would be all over it, fair enough , not your dough.
There is no 10 year game changer so you buy what is on the market and you buy someone who is going to keep you at the top. Kane is that man.
You are correct, not my dough. Kane will do his job for X years then the next latest and greatest will be on the market or who knows maybe its Torres or Delap.
Well here's half the squad having a great time which is a PG version for socials. A safe bet Jack is doing similar.
Scary thing is, I could genuinely see Levy going with that line, and keeping a straight face !Jokes on Kane though. Levy doesn't classify as a gentleman so that agreement is void.
Again this was my point. <£100m is reasonable anything over it isn't the right deal for us. For other clubs like utd they would pay £150 as that's were their goals come from. With us we have 5/6 players capable of 10 goals or over from different areas of the pitch. We are more a unit than a team with 2 star players carrying the team. Foden, kdb, Jesus, sterling gundogan, mahrez, bernado can all score and assist 10 goals or more. Without rodri, dias, stones, etc chipping in, not many teams can boast that.I really can't see an outcome that ends in anyone paying more than £100m for Kane never mind £150m. No one is going to nearly double the British transfer record for a 28 year old. If Levy insists on that sort of fee they'll be stuck with Kane.
I say stuck because they'll still be below the level they want to be at by some margin. They'll have a depreciating asset who doesn't want to be there and they still won't have the significant funds, they clearly need for player investment.
Just puzzles me why everyone thinks Levy holds all the aces in this negotiation. One more statement of discontent from Kane and I reckon he's gone and for a reasonablish fee
Asked a Spursy mate what he thought of the Nuno appointment. (Me thinking they’d not actually done a bad deal.) “Underwhelmed“, he replied, “we wanted a big name like Conti.”
Deluded. Maybe what Levy has is contagious.
I’d love to see a retrospective cost benefit analysis of the Mourinho appointment.
you wood say that,wood you knot?Such a plank