Fair enough. The majority see the interview as a come and get me plea to certain clubs. Everything he said will have been said for a reason, whether generic or not.
If you’re angling for a move then why seemingly rule out playing abroad if you’re actually willing to move there?
If the interview didn’t really mean much then nothing can be taken from it in terms of where his head is at and, to me anyway, that’s not true.
Are you Alan Partridge?
that's not what messi did.Is Kane just doing a messi ?
putting pressure on the club to invest & buy some new players.
the more I look at it he’s not leaving Spurs having just signed an extension & we ain’t paying more than £100 mil.
hope we don’t spend all summer wasting time on kane
But Poch still won nothing first time around, so with a ramshackle squad and without the funds to make massive differences, I cannot see Kane pinning his hopes on them winning anything, in the foreseeable future. His whole desire is to win trophies, so I really cannot see a new manager helping the spuds retain him willingly.The talk of Poch going back to spurs have perked up the spurs fans and them thinking Kane now might stay if they do get Poch! So job done spotlight of the spurs being shite and the scum losing to a championship side!!
No chance Laporte wants that.Spurs desperately want a center back ...I see Laporte being top of the list ....
Sterling no chance, Ake is a good call, good move for him.Ake plus Sterling plus £x million
Both return London.
Sterling could transform Spurs into a genuine top 4 club (as much as he frustrates me recently). We get Grealish.
Ake is a good defender. Laporte is happier.
I would have to think that if his contract contained such language it would be common knowledge by now.Is it conceivable that when Kane signed his life to Spurs with that 6 year contract, that it could stipulate that if they haven’t won silverware or finished in the top 4 every year, that he is free to leave after 3 years for £100m.
I have no idea how contracts go, but this would partly explain the comments from Kane about Levy accepting £100m.
City aren’t going to comment on anything until CL over.
For me Haaland over Kane but happily see both in blue.
Fair enough, I've no idea how easy or otherwise keeping these things are. But yeah if he's hankering for a move someone would have leaked I guessI would have to think that if his contract contained such language it would be common knowledge by now.
I doubt many contracts would contain that sort of language and as has been stated often here, few if any contracts with PL clubs contain release clauses. Players and clubs enter into long term contracts for the obvious mutual benefits attaching to both parties. Also a player knows that in most cases they are not signing their career mobility away.I would have to think that if his contract contained such language it would be common knowledge by now.
But not inconceivable, depending what’s being said to Sterling behind the scenes.Sterling no chance, Ake is a good call, good move for him.