Harry Kane

[Grealish’s Shinpads]

That would be a massive 33 years older than Jude Bellingham, he's 17 if you didn't know.

Are you sure about that? Where did you hear this?

 

[Coatigan]

You can say that but you would be wrong. Kane is at worst the 3rd best striker in the world.

And by all means complain about the price, I have no issue with that as I said earlier. But saying he isn't good enough is just a lie.

Genuinely, never said he wasn't good enough, no need to twist it. I said he wasnt 'the best' (which is subjective anyway) as is repeatedly aggresively claimed, and anyone that dare think othersise is labled all sorts of crap.

The only reason it matters anyway because ot is relative to a price that could get a top player AND profile.

Yes, I think the price it would take is way too much for what we'd be getting.

 

[JOGAMIGMOG]

Maybe the news of City bidding 100m is a bluff to entice others into the fray. Whilst the others are lining up their bids City are busy getting the deal done for Haaland.

 

[wolviedinho]

So… is Kane still overrated and overpriced with dodgy ankles or have we accepted that he is 1 of the best forwards in world football with an obscene goal +assist tally and maybe he is not as injury prone as some would have you believe?

Either way, levy and Spurs can get fucked for anything over £100 million ;)

 

[Chi-town blues]

So… is Kane still overrated and overpriced with dodgy ankles or have we accepted that he is 1 of the best forwards in world football with an obscene goal +assist tally and maybe he is not as injury prone as some would have you believe?

Either way, levy and Spurs can get fucked for anything over £100 million ;)

Anything north of 100 million is called “messi money “
Hope levy and kane is aware of that comparable sale .

 

[I'm Blue]

I am probably going to get absolutely ripped apart for this….

but with everything that is going on at Spurs I don’t half feel bad for daniel levy

Welcome to the forum Mrs Levy

 

[I'm Blue]

Where’s the thread gone that said the deal was off?
I liked him ; )

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

We should stick our offer on their table and not budge from it because we need to ditch being a soft touch and become as hard nosed as Levy.

 

[Dobsy]

We should stick our offer on their table and not budge from it because we need to ditch being a soft touch and become as hard nosed as Levy.

They have to reject the first offer for appearances.

City go back with a little more to create the impression that Levy has negotiated firmly.

If they really do dig in after that then agreed, I'd walk away. Don't want to end up like Woodward with Sancho last summer.

 

[HelloCity]

Na, your obsession with semantics to try argue a point on technicalities says it all.

Kane is on the same level as Mane and Vardy, and below Aguero and Salah. Even arguably useless Sterling in 2 of the last 3 seasons.

Not sure why the obsession to argue he has to be proclaimes the absolute best. If you really want it so bad, he is the best English striker, that plays centrally, under the age of 30 over the height of 5.4 feet.

Tbf he’s one of the top central strikers in the world with Haaland, Ronaldo and Lewandowski. His record in terms of goals and even assists speaks for itself.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

It is shaping up like a classic City transfer. Do the deal with the player first. Agree with him not to talk to anyone else.

Then bid and negotiate from a position of strength with nobody else in the frame. BAsically what Bayern did to us with Sane. It helps if the player has only one year left of course.

 

[BlueMoonRisin’]

They have to reject the first offer for appearances.

City go back with a little more to create the impression that Levy has negotiated firmly.

If they really do dig in after that then agreed, I'd walk away. Don't want to end up like Woodward with Sancho last summer.

Levy Is probably the hardest chairman to negotiate a deal with and we don't want to be wasting the summer over Kane If he's is holding out for silly money

 

[I'm Blue]

Levy Is probably the hardest chairman to negotiate a deal with and we don't want to be wasting the summer over Kane If he's is holding out for silly money

Nah he’s gone soft apparently.
He’s broke and once we tell him take it or leave it, he’ll except.

 

[Heidenreich]

How high are the chances that we are going to pay the 150M asking price?

 

[Keeper!]

It is shaping up like a classic City transfer. Do the deal with the player first. Agree with him not to talk to anyone else.

Then bid and negotiate from a position of strength with nobody else in the frame. BAsically what Bayern did to us with Sane. It helps if the player has only one year left of course.

Nothing like what Bayern did, we had no choice but to sell him and on Bayerns terms.

Unless Levy gets a crazy cash bid, Kane will stay, I said before , to Spurs he is worth more than 100m. Without him they are a mid table team at best. He stays they finish in the top 8 and the stadium stays reasonably full, Levy is happy.

 

[balotellishaircut]

Where’s the thread gone that said the deal was off?
I liked him ; )

Big Mals Cigar, don’t know obviously mods pulled it but why

 

[Dave Ewing's Back 'eader]

Nah he’s gone soft apparently.
He’s broke and once we tell him take it or leave it, he’ll except.

It's high time we told clubs to lump it or dump it. We are in the same market as everyone else and we should be paying the going rate and not a SkyBlue rate.

 

[Phil1]

Big Mals Cigar, don’t know obviously mods pulled it but why

Because he was a massive wum and finally got deservedly fucked off.
I thought he was the original BMC at first but became pretty obvious within a few days he wasn’t.

 

[Didsbury Dave]

Nothing like what Bayern did, we had no choice but to sell him and on Bayerns terms.

Unless Levy gets a crazy cash bid, Kane will stay, I said before , to Spurs he is worth more than 100m. Without him they are a mid table team at best. He stays they finish in the top 8 and the stadium stays reasonably full, Levy is happy.

That's what Levy would want you to think but it's miles wide of the mark. If your best player wants to leave and you block it then you risk upsetting the whole squad and ruining the whole season. And also your asset depreciates hugely for a year when he's 27. Kane wants to leave, Levy needs to sell and also needs to buy a replacement. City will know that. We will presumably have told Kane that we will sign him unless the price is stupid, ensuring he doesn't listen to other offers. It might well go to deadline day, in fact it probably will, but a deal will be done.

 

[Keeper!]

That's what Levy would want you to think but it's miles wide of the mark. If your best player wants to leave and you block it then you risk upsetting the whole squad and ruining the whole season. And also your asset depreciates hugely for a year when he's 27. Kane wants to leave, Levy needs to sell and also needs to buy a replacement. City will know that. We will presumably have told Kane that we will sign him unless the price is stupid, ensuring he doesn't listen to other offers. It might well go to deadline day, in fact it probably will, but a deal will be done.

But, he still has 3 years on his deal, and to be honest, do you think the other players really care?

Son would be gutted if Kane went.

Kane was happy to sign that contract extension when things were all bright and rosy, loyalty works both ways.

If Spurs are desperate for cash and need cash, then I totally agree with you, the deal will be done.