Harry Kane

[mccity]

I think she was responding to this comment:

"People who don't want him to sign seems to be the answer to that judging by the comments".

Yeah and considering she's not a Kane lover it fits the answer.

 

[Phil1]

Why do people think that a club with a history of missing out on multiple top players due to not wanting to get shafted over transfer fees, wages, or agent fees, is suddenly going to buckle for Harry Kane?

Circumstance more than anything. He's the best available, wants to play for us, is highly thought of by our manager and plays a position we are desperate to fill.
Still a chance of course it doesn't happen but there are reasons why we'd be looking to do the deal.

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

No, he just has a compulsion to oppose me everywhere

That really isn't difficult. Infact you seem to oppose everyone and when you don't like what people say in response to you, you throw your toys out of the pram and call out 'stalker'. You seem to argue with everyone.

 

[blueparrot]

I think there is an underlying feeling that st Harold of Kane just isn't worth it.

I don’t know how anyone thinks the p/l best striker isn’t worth it, but do think it will and probably should be about the same as KDB.Whatever that is.

 

[cjn]

Do you think Kane should be earning more than Kev?

I don't care and neither should you. Kev just signed his deal, he's happy with it, and if the best striker in the league and PL record transfer comes in making marginally more then that's life.

 

[asahartford1]

No, he just has a compulsion to oppose me everywhere

He must have big balls)

 

[kaz7]

That really isn't difficult. Infact you seem to oppose everyone and when you don't like what people say in response to you, you throw your toys out of the pram and call out 'stalker'. You seem to argue with everyone.

Stop stalking me , fed up of you

 

[BillyShears]

I have avoided transfer forum from day one up until now and your advice is exactly what I normally do. Am gonna blame my participation in the big Jessie thread on long covid.

There's people who live in this forum, who seemingly don't believe anything. I can't help but feel that they're just here for the attention.

That sort of weird "ooh look at how edgy I am, I don't believe anything that's written in the media, all the ITK's are chancers, I'm so clever and not gullible, but I love the transfer forum".

Five minutes later.

"FFS, why aren't we signing Harland he's a blue thru and thru ya know. Kane has glass ankles. club don't know what they're doing".

It's all fucking hilarious if you ask me.

 

[mccity]

Circumstance more than anything. He's the best available, wants to play for us, is highly thought of by our manager and plays a position we are desperate to fill.
Still a chance of course it doesn't happen but there are reasons why we'd be looking to do the deal.

True, but even if we were desperate we wouldn't let ourselves get screwed over financially. We've been stubborn in that sense for a while.

 

[Phil1]

I don't care and neither should you. Kev just signed his deal, he's happy with it, and if the PL record transfer comes in making marginally more then that's life.

I'll decide what to care or not to care about when it comes to my support of the club but thanks.

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

I think there is an underlying feeling that st Harold of Kane just isn't worth it.

I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.

 

[blueparrot]

Why do people think that a club with a history of missing out on multiple top players due to not wanting to get shafted over transfer fees, wages, or agent fees, is suddenly going to buckle for Harry Kane?

Because we always seemed to have alternatives or beleive we could manage without. This time that isn’t the case.

 

[LangleyBlue1970]

Stop stalking me , fed up of you

Bingo.

 

[stonerblue]

and his brother John Silver?

Him an all.

 

[mccity]

Because we always seemed to have alternatives or beleive we could manage without. This time that isn’t the case.

The club still wouldn't shatter it's financial policies over this. We're not run by Ed Woodward.

 

[cjn]

I'll decide what to care or not to care about when it comes to my support of the club but thanks.

Well this is a forum, so I was trying to create discussion, but ok?

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.

I'll be among the most fickle of the fickle in cheering him on as soon as he pulls on the blue shirt, but until then I'll stick to thinking he's an overpriced, overrated snide.

 

[asahartford1]

I think what it is, is the fact it isn't as 'exciting' as Haaland. The irony is that they'd more than happily agree Haaland is worth £400k a week, because they then get to brag 'we got Haaland'. It's bizarre, the negativity towards Kane. In true fickle fan style though, they'll laud his goals and contribution to the team when he continuously scores goals, week in, week out.

So because I wouldn't pay 160 million pounds and give him 400 grand a week I am a "fickle fan"
Guess I am a fickle fan then, a diehard would gladly pay whatever Levy wants.

 

[lonestay]

Can we just sign him and move on ?
Not a fan of him but we are obviously gonna buy him, so we are gonna have to hope that he scores all these goals .

 

[blueparrot]

The club still wouldn't shatter it's financial policies over this. We're not run by Ed Woodward.

No it wouldn’t and we’ll have a limit. We will pay what we can afford. We seem determined to get Kane, we will know we can’t get him for any less than £120 mill plus add ons IMO. If we thought he was out of our reach we’d have distanced ourselves from the stories, sounds like we’ve said we won’t pay 160 mill, but unlike other players haven’t said we aren’t interested.