Harry Kane

[theone91]

I think we all know it's already happened which is why you paupers are splashing the cash.

Lol splashing the cash, we have 10 players up for sale, 2 of them already out the door in which we’ve received 30 million for. We’re still the 10th richest club in the world despite what Levy let’s on, we will have a net spend of around 20-30 mil this summer, most of the money will be made from the widely reported 10 who are up for sale. Paratici told every manager interviewed for the job this summer kane would not be sold and money would be made from other sales.

 

[mosssideblue]

Because its bollocks from any fan who gives a shit. We dont have endless money and paying exhorbitantly may well affect other business immediately or down the line...its such a cop out of a response.

I mean look dont take offense its just i keep hearing the same bollocks almost word for word.

What is bollocks are fans thinking they understand the detailed finances of the club and how any spending now might impact.

The club are professionally run and do not spend gung ho, even though some seem to think they might.

 

[theone91]

See there’s a massive mistake here In the paragraph.

CREDIBLE JOURNALISTS.

there are no credible journalists they get briefed by clubs and sometimes rarely get lucky with inside bludy news. especially in Levy’s case he owns London media he can continue to put what he wants Into reports on Kane, if he wants to say Kanes staying then he can say Kane’s staying. But behind the scenes you are SKINT. You need money this transfer splurge your doing is adding up to nearly over 100 mil, so where’s that money coming from hmmm.

Romano is a chancer and is hated by other journalist, because he’s a chancer and populist he’s no more reliable than any other journalist.

We have 10 players up for sale 2 out the door
So Romano just randomly guessed the Gil/lamela transfer last week, you know the story he broke which less than a week later is now official, there is a thing called credible journos you’re all choosing not to believe because it doesn’t suit what you want. If next week Romano tweets saying here we go to kane to Man City, you will all be saying it’s valid. But because all these credible journos are saying it’s not on, they’re suddenly not credible.
We are not as skint as levy makes out, 10 th richest club in the world, everyone knows the stadium debt which is to be payed back over 15 years does not affect our transfers, if you actually look we’ve spent more since moving in to the stadium lol.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

I can only assume a few factors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will not matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year.


I will be happy to see Kane arrive.

you missed out one factor, many blues think he will cost too much money and because of that City will be putting all our eggs in one basket so to speak.

 

[blueparrot]

you missed out one factor, many blues think he will cost too much money and because of that City will be putting all our eggs in one basket so to speak.

The only ones that think that are those that think Soriano, Khaldoon , Berrada are profligate and reckless with our finances.I don't.

 

[urban genie]

Because its bollocks from any fan who gives a shit. We dont have endless money and paying exhorbitantly may well affect other business immediately or down the line...its such a cop out of a response.

I mean look dont take offense its just i keep hearing the same bollocks almost word for word.

We are recouping nearly 100M possibly in players sales and also on wages, add that to any forecast budget the club has for transfers in and I am sure it is aware of what it is doing finacially.


Whether you, me or anyone else thinks they know whats best, I expect our accountants know better.

Would I want to spend 100M + on a striker? No not really, but if that is what we have to and the club believes it can afford to, then so be it.

 

[Newman Noggs]

I can only assume a few factors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will not matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year.


I will be happy to see Kane arrive.

I'd be happy to see Kane arrive for £75m or less. We won't get him for that, of course, so I'd prefer us not to sign him. If the question was qualified according to price, I might have answered "yes".

The reason price matters (to me, if no-one else), and I'm conscious that these are personal preferences, is because a) I take pleasure from the fact that our success has been achieved without paying the Galactico prices which have fucked over the history clubs b) paying the sorts of figures being bandied about, in my opinion makes the player bigger than the club in that they are very hard to drop or sell on c) if that player gets injured you've put all your eggs into that basket d) I have a sneaking regard for players that turn down mega-money moves to stay at their home club and e) I don't want to bail that shithouse club out of the financial mess their poor stewardship and lack of contingency planning have got them in.

Nothing to do with Haaland. But a) I accept the club have a better idea of his value than I (or anyone on Bluemoon) do and will make the appropriate decision and b) whatever they decide I'll back the club and the player to the hilt.

 

[OliMCFC]

I couldn't give a shit how much we spend.

Haaland isn't really available and even if he was, the rumoured wages are off-putting. Kane coming in at a price that he is worth considering he's the best striker in the Prem, the England captain, media darling etc etc, I can't wait. He'll score loads.

 

[urban genie]

I'd be happy to see Kane arrive for £75m or less. We won't get him for that, of course, so I'd prefer us not to sign him. If the question was qualified according to price, I might have answered "yes".

The reason price matters (to me, if no-one else), and I'm conscious that these are personal preferences, is because a) I take pleasure from the fact that our success has been achieved without paying the Galactico prices which have fucked over the history clubs b) paying the sorts of figures being bandied about, in my opinion makes the player bigger than the club in that they are very hard to drop or sell on c) if that player gets injured you've put all your eggs into that basket d) I have a sneaking regard for players that turn down mega-money moves to stay at their home club and e) I don't want to bail that shithouse club out of the financial mess their poor stewardship and lack of contingency planning have got them in.

Nothing to do with Haaland. But a) I accept the club have a better idea of his value than I (or anyone on Bluemoon) do and will make the appropriate decision and b) whatever they decide I'll back the club and the player to the hilt.

I left price out because I was responding to a question why do so many here seem to hate/dislike him.

Also I think the price thing ties in with the age thing so didn't need to be added, if he was haalands age the fee would be less of a factor to many but a lot are liking tge price to age /resale value, for me that it the clubs perogative to decide.

 

[Airbags Optional]

I can only assume a few factors into peoples rationale

1. He plays for spurs, and spurs are hated by many a blue for the fact they're cunts
2. His generally shithousery on the pitch, the croping diving twat.
3. Some have got fixated with the idea we were getting haaland and cannot accept any other option
4. The appparent misconception he is always injured and unavailable for games
5. His age, city don't buy players over 25 etc

All theses reason are a nonsense:
I fucking detest spurs and while he wears their shirt he is a diving cropping cockerney ****, bit I want him here if we can get him and all that will not matter to me.
The age thing is bollocks we have bought 28 years olds in this recent period.
His injury recod isn't as bad as made out, and even so he still manages to bag shitloads of goals.
And finally the because I want Haaland lot, well you don't always get what you want and be grateful we have the ability to buy the best Striker in the premier league at present and hope Haaland may arrive next year.


I will be happy to see Kane arrive.

All valid points but I don’t want Kane as I have never seen him play and thought “my god he is world class”. There are forwards who you think, yeah he is special, like Sergio, Kane is not one of them. Granted I don’t watch him a lot and if we get him I may be wrong but it’s a no from me.