Cobwebcat
Well-Known Member
They want billions! :-)If we're considering paying 150m for Kane we really need to bale out and spend it on Haaland.
They want billions! :-)If we're considering paying 150m for Kane we really need to bale out and spend it on Haaland.
Well yes, so as I said Txiki can’t decide to just pay £160 mill for Kane it isn’t his job, or I guess he’d just do it as balancing the books isn’t his job. He’ll be told his budget.But only because it would have prevented other deals leaving us with just one player bought. Too much.
Even Anthony Martial?After watching that we 100% need a striker of any kind
i just think this will kick off big time next week before the season starts
Even Anthony Martial?
We have one of any kind, I want Kane as much as anyone, but Jesus is no donkey and better than he’s given credit for in here.After watching that we 100% need a striker of any kind
if we're at that stage then it's done.All our eggs are in the Kane basket. So it’s simple…if we end up with Kane it’s been worth the wait if we don’t it’s been a waste.
TH says we have recommenced negotiations and are talking add-ons.
I have faith. Come on City.
yesdid kane report for training today as reported ??
if we're at that stage then it's done.
did kane report for training today as reported ??
yhp, we all know either way it'll be reported with everything included and more just to make a point.It’s a good sign he said:
That stance has changed in the last 48 hours.
Spurs will accept a reduced base figure but the add-ons are very achievable.
Would take it closer to what they want, but if we win the Champs League, we would be happy to pay it, anyhow.
They also want a scoring bonus.
Who said this? Tolms?It’s a good sign he said:
That stance has changed in the last 48 hours.
Spurs will accept a reduced base figure but the add-ons are very achievable.
Would take it closer to what they want, but if we win the Champs League, we would be happy to pay it, anyhow.
They also want a scoring bonus.
Yeah page 1729 ….seems to have been missed yet quite a statement with details of requirement. You would think that if his info is good it should get done from there.Who said this? Tolms?
I'd add presumptuous and incredibly arrogant. Even at full strength with a striker it was always going to be tricky. I can only imagine what kind of reactions they'd have if we'd lost that with Kane on the pitch.This thread is becoming as childish, pathetic and embarrassing as the nonsense on rawk and sadcafe that gets linked.......we didn't lose the friendly today because we didn't have Kane.
I imagine the Haaland thread would see a lot of activity...I'd add presumptuous and incredibly arrogant. Even at full strength with a striker it was always going to be tricky. I can only imagine what kind of reactions they'd have if we'd lost that with Kane on the pitch.