Harry Kane

But only because it would have prevented other deals leaving us with just one player bought. Too much.
Well yes, so as I said Txiki can’t decide to just pay £160 mill for Kane it isn’t his job, or I guess he’d just do it as balancing the books isn’t his job. He’ll be told his budget.
 
i just think this will kick off big time next week before the season starts

It suits Levey to keep haggling....................he knows he won't get his fantasy figure but he MIGHT budge us up. However if he can pad it out to say Thursday with Kane not training he can get £100m and sell us a non-match fit Harry Kane on Thursday so he has his cash and guarantee's Kane won't play in the opening game.....fancy that
 
if we're at that stage then it's done.

It’s a good sign he said:

That stance has changed in the last 48 hours.

Spurs will accept a reduced base figure but the add-ons are very achievable.

Would take it closer to what they want, but if we win the Champs League, we would be happy to pay it, anyhow.

They also want a scoring bonus.
 
It’s a good sign he said:

That stance has changed in the last 48 hours.

Spurs will accept a reduced base figure but the add-ons are very achievable.

Would take it closer to what they want, but if we win the Champs League, we would be happy to pay it, anyhow.

They also want a scoring bonus.
yhp, we all know either way it'll be reported with everything included and more just to make a point.

Reduced base seems to suggest we aren't selling as many as first thought.

If Kane plays well enough and we win enough to trigger bonuses then it's win-win.
 
It’s a good sign he said:

That stance has changed in the last 48 hours.

Spurs will accept a reduced base figure but the add-ons are very achievable.

Would take it closer to what they want, but if we win the Champs League, we would be happy to pay it, anyhow.

They also want a scoring bonus.
Who said this? Tolms?
 
This thread is becoming as childish, pathetic and embarrassing as the nonsense on rawk and sadcafe that gets linked.......we didn't lose the friendly today because we didn't have Kane.
I'd add presumptuous and incredibly arrogant. Even at full strength with a striker it was always going to be tricky. I can only imagine what kind of reactions they'd have if we'd lost that with Kane on the pitch.
 
I'd add presumptuous and incredibly arrogant. Even at full strength with a striker it was always going to be tricky. I can only imagine what kind of reactions they'd have if we'd lost that with Kane on the pitch.
I imagine the Haaland thread would see a lot of activity...
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top