Harry Kane

[CityBluez]

Why? Who is there if Kane is not coming that is gettable and good enough?

I would like to know if we fail to sign kane this summer would you like the club to try and get him next summer?

 

[Dax777]

Why? Who is there if Kane is not coming that is gettable and good enough?

Patrick Bamford

 

[Keeper!]

I would like to know if we fail to sign kane this summer would you like the club to try and get him next summer?

I would say no, but depends upon price and form.

Now or never for Kane.

 

[Keeper!]

Patrick Bamford

Big risk, if he does it again this season maybe.

 

[CityBluez]

I would say no, but depends upon price and form.

Now or never for Kane.

Who are the striker/(s) you think city can get next summer that they cant get this summer?

 

[blueparrot]

I would like to know if we fail to sign kane this summer would you like the club to try and get him next summer?

Depends who is available next summer if we don’t get him. My opinion , we will so not something I need to spend time now thinking too much about.

 

[Bluemooner33]

Who are the striker/(s) you think city can get next summer that they cant get this summer?

Haaland for 70million ish I think his releases clause is

 

[Keeper!]

Who are the striker/(s) you think city can get next summer that they cant get this summer?

Who knows, maybe someone comes out of nowhere.

Maybe we have to make an offer Riola/Haaland can't refuse.

Football changes quickly, no one knows what the situation will be in one year from now.

 

[wolviedinho]

Seems like a big add-on for winning the Champion's League would be the best idea.

Levy gets his valuation and I'm sure City would be happy to pay pretty much anything if it means we finally rule Europe. But maybe that's already in place and it's add-ons for niggly things like games played and all that carry-on that's holding back the progress - plus Spurs wanting to get players in without knowing they're bathing in hot-tubs of money.

Why should City help Spurs when they want to rip the hole out of Kane’s transfer fee?

 

[jimharri]

 

[Claytop]

Christ, even having Ings yesterday would have probably won us the game.

It’s staggering how poor we are in-front of goal.

 

[wolviedinho]

Yea but we have also 1 statt that is most important:

A Premier league trophy.

Fuck Sky.

 

[Oldham Exile]

Patrick Bamford

I think that he would score a hat full of goals in our team. I was saying last year that he should be a target for us

 

[CityBluez]

Who knows, maybe someone comes out of nowhere.

Maybe we have to make an offer Riola/Haaland can't refuse.

Football changes quickly, no one knows what the situation will be in one year from now.

If you are holding onto haaland then that's fair.
But other than him the same set of back up options(to kane) that are available this year will also be available next year and you have to choose from them.

 

[HolisticJim]

If we don't get Kane then I'd put Delap up front.

 

[lionheart]

Why? Who is there if Kane is not coming that is gettable and good enough?

Patrick Bamford would be a wise investment and would not cost a fortune. Much better than Delap and still young enough to learn.

 

[p.taker]

Patrick Bamford would be a wise investment and would not cost a fortune. Much better than Delap and still young enough to learn.

lol he's a month younger than Kane

 

[Eoiyflem]

I think that he would score a hat full of goals in our team. I was saying last year that he should be a target for us

Jesus Christ. He's had 1 half decent season ever, when there were no crowds, and he's 28

 

[Eoiyflem]

Ladies and gentlemen, the 28 year old player who some suggest is a good option for us this season, Patrick Bamford...

 

[morleyaurora]

Ladies and gentlemen, the 28 year old player who some suggest is a good option for us this season, Patrick Bamford...

can,t believe anybody seriously thinks bamford or ings make us a better team