You may be right and I know jack shit about football finances but I find it hard to believe that selling Kane is the only option Levy has to pay that. We all know how suddenly money is found by football clubs when needed. Like I said you may be right but my mind would be blown if Levy has left himself in that position and hasn't explored other avenues rather than have to sell Spurs talisman.
At £160m it's the clearest indication that it's 'buying' the next trophy!
Yep. And that is why this is starting to worry me slightly.Seems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
The only way we get "shafted" is us paying more than market value - it happens or it doesn't. If it doesn’t Spurs haven't shafted us, they've just not had their valuation met for a player under contract.Dangerous approach for us, if they sign one forward and then say they are keeping Harry to play with that new striker
Sick of this Kane transfer as feel it's obvious we are going to get shafted
Hmm. 2,500 pages beg to differ.Seems pretty simple to me this.
Does the rest of Europe not get the news? Pretty sure everyone knows that if Spurs are looking to buy a striker it's because Kane is going.Seems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
I’m sure the other clubs they’re buying from will have a bit of cop on by now that they’ll be using the Kane money especially the club they’re buying a striker fromSeems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
Or because he’s pissed off with Levy’s stance and lack of progress, so his mind’s not in the right place?If that was the case Kane would 100% have played yesterday.
the reason he was back late training is so they had an excuse not to play him. Why would they do that with their best player?
because a deal is already agreed.
Fuckin light "feather" weight...Duck off
Personally I'm hoping Spurs are in the Championship next season.Went onto Spurcommunity the other day to ask a question on Harry Kane. I don't know why I expected anything else but just got slammed with City criticism, abuse and all of a sudden turns into slamming our owners as a reason I can't talk about football.
Anyone getting a bit tired of the constant bias towards us?
Also, i'm excited to see Kane finally score for us at Tottenham ground next year. Hat trick hopefully.
Your fucking quackers.Fuckin light "feather" weight...
I'm hoping they're in administration.Personally I'm hoping Spurs are in the Championship next season.
Hi from ManCityNumbersI’ve heard what a few others have, that City are very confident of getting this deal done. It’s such a strange one with Spurs seemingly putting out the opposite message.
If we buy Kane then they'd have to fuck something upI'm hoping they're in administration.