PragueBlue
Well-Known Member
Same here. Best RB in the league in my opinion. Rather him than Cancelo but Leicester aren't going to sell cheaply and we don't seem to have any interest.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Maguire
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
Same here. Best RB in the league in my opinion. Rather him than Cancelo but Leicester aren't going to sell cheaply and we don't seem to have any interest.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
that's not what you said though. You said "at that price, he isn't good enough" - price doesn't decide a players suitability is my pointI can’t fathom how we could consider breaking the transfer record for a defender who is no better than our third choice CB.
No club, not even United will pay £100mill for Maguire.
City won’t. United won’t, after their dreadful recent signings, and massive wage bill rise. Liverpool don‘t need him. Arsenal and Spurs won’t spend that amount of money on a player. Chelsea’s have a transfer ban. So Maguire has 2 options. To stay at Leicester, carry on playing for them, and run his contract down. Or he and his agent try and instigate a move. But I don’t think he is the type of player to do that to Leicester. But if something doesn’t happen, he will play out his best years at Leicester, and the miss a final chance to play for a club that wins trophies, and playing in the CL will also pass him by.
City won’t. United won’t, after their dreadful recent signings, and massive wage bill rise. Liverpool don‘t need him. Arsenal and Spurs won’t spend that amount of money on a player. Chelsea’s have a transfer ban. So Maguire has 2 options. To stay at Leicester, carry on playing for them, and run his contract down. Or he and his agent try and instigate a move. But I don’t think he is the type of player to do that to Leicester. But if something doesn’t happen, he will play out his best years at Leicester, and the miss a final chance to play for a club that wins trophies, and playing in the CL will also pass him by.
It shouldn't but with FFP and the politics surrounding City it probably does.that's not what you said though. You said "at that price, he isn't good enough" - price doesn't decide a players suitability is my point
Last week it was £65m. Now it's £100m. The media don't set the price. LCFC do. However there also needs to be a bidder. I don't think there's any evidence that City are in the market for a central defender, and if we were in for a central defender, surely we'd have some believable evidence by now. i.e.SSN understands that MCFC have made a bid of X, or LCFC have turned down a bid of X, and the player is not for sale etc. There's been nothing like that, just outlandish claims from nowhere.No club, not even United will pay £100mill for Maguire.
City won’t. United won’t, after their dreadful recent signings, and massive wage bill rise. Liverpool don‘t need him. Arsenal and Spurs won’t spend that amount of money on a player. Chelsea’s have a transfer ban. So Maguire has 2 options. To stay at Leicester, carry on playing for them, and run his contract down. Or he and his agent try and instigate a move. But I don’t think he is the type of player to do that to Leicester. But if something doesn’t happen, he will play out his best years at Leicester, and the miss a final chance to play for a club that wins trophies, and playing in the CL will also pass him by.
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
It shouldn't but with FFP and the politics surrounding City it probably does.
Last week it was £65m. Now it's £100m. The media don't set the price. LCFC do. However there also needs to be a bidder. I don't think there's any evidence that City are in the market for a central defender, and if we were in for a central defender, surely we'd have some believable evidence by now. i.e.SSN understands that MCFC have made a bid of X, or LCFC have turned down a bid of X, and the player is not for sale etc. There's been nothing like that, just outlandish claims from nowhere.
Sorry Marv, but that is just barmy.
Forget any cost is the guy good enough or not?
Super David Silva 21
Well-Known Member
How's Maguire gone from £60 million to £100 million in the space of 4 days.
I'd rather stick with Mangala.
I'd rather stick with Mangala.
I don't think there's any evidence that City are in the market for a central defender, and if we were in for a central defender, surely we'd have some believable evidence by now. i.e.SSN understands that MCFC have made a bid of X, or LCFC have turned down a bid of X, and the player is not for sale etc. There's been nothing like that, just outlandish claims from nowhere.
What? The one thing anyone with sources at the club can agree on this summer is that we're in for a central defender, and specifically in for Maguire. From Sam Lee and Mullock all the way down the line to Tolmie. You must not have been looking very hard.
D
D
Deleted member 81382
Guest
No.Sorry Marv, but that is just barmy.
Forget any cost is the guy good enough or not?
mosssideblue
Well-Known Member
That may or may not be the correct answer, but some seem to be able only to come to that conclusion because of the fee
Fordyboy46
Well-Known Member
We'll reach an agreement at 75m plus add ons I reckon. The Mahrez deal was a saga, I expect this to be exactly the same.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.