Harry Maguire

[BlueDejong]

If it's about English quota I'd prefer chilwell. Maguire isn't as bad as some make out but suspect we'll get rinsed.

me too go get Chilwell

 

[Citygolf]

Does he play in our best 11?? Ahead of Stones??

 

[trotsky]

me too go get Chilwell

Get both.
Walker. - Stones. - Maguire. - Chillwell
The England back four. Obviously this line-up would only start for us occasionally - but if England become (semi)successful Pep will be hailed a hero by the media and the murmurings of Pep and the England manager's job will become deafening.
When Pep decides to depart (hopefully a long way away), taking the England job would be the most acceptable option for me.
*lip slightly wobbles at thought of no more Pep*

 

[Delphinho]

Get both.
Walker. - Stones. - Maguire. - Chillwell
The England back four. Obviously this line-up would only start for us occasionally - but if England become (semi)successful Pep will be hailed a hero by the media and the murmurings of Pep and the England manager's job will become deafening.
When Pep decides to depart (hopefully a long way away), taking the England job would be the most acceptable option for me.
*lip slightly wobbles at thought of no more Pep*

He won’t be hailed a hero if that happened, he would have been called a chequebook manager

 

[bluebanana83]

I really don’t want either. I think there is better out there. In fact for me I don’t see Maguire as an improvement over Stones, Laporte or Otamendi. Nor do I see Chillwell as a massive gain over Zinchenko, Danilo and Mendy (if fit).

If we are spending big money on a CB then they have to be in the De Ligt standard. Left back if Danilo stays I’d be happy to go with what we have and promote our own youth for a few games here and there. Chilwell is a good player but he’s not £75m good which is what is being quoted. I find the prices ridiculous. He’s had one season at Leicester. When we paid £50m for Walker he was an established international with many seasons under his belt playing at the top end with Spurs.

 

[oakiecokie]

I really don’t want either. I think there is better out there. In fact for me I don’t see Maguire as an improvement over Stones, Laporte or Otamendi. Nor do I see Chillwell as a massive gain over Zinchenko, Danilo and Mendy (if fit).

If we are spending big money on a CB then they have to be in the De Ligt standard. Left back if Danilo stays I’d be happy to go with what we have and promote our own youth for a few games here and there. Chilwell is a good player but he’s not £75m good which is what is being quoted. I find the prices ridiculous. He’s had one season at Leicester. When we paid £50m for Walker he was an established international with many seasons under his belt playing at the top end with Spurs.

Mahrez was quoted (by Leicester) as a £90M player.We didn`t do too badly with the £60M so I for one will completely ignore the figures being banded about.

 

[SPIDERBOY]

Teddy Sheringham reckons Maguire can become the rags "Vincent Kompany"

 

[mosssideblue]

Does he play in our best 11?? Ahead of Stones??

You need to think a little broader. We have a squad from which for any particular game Pep will select the best 11. Some games that will include Stones and others it wont

 

[Deleted member 81382]

Get both.
Walker. - Stones. - Maguire. - Chillwell
The England back four. Obviously this line-up would only start for us occasionally - but if England become (semi)successful Pep will be hailed a hero by the media

Don't think we'll waste what will probably be over 100m on two average players just to get praise from the English media. I couldn't give a toss what they think about us, I'd rather just concentrate on signing players that actually improve us.

 

[yankblue]

Does he play in our best 11?? Ahead of Stones??

Up until now has Stones even been in our best 11?

 

[StretfordBlueReece]

Up until now has Stones even been in our best 11?

would rather have stones than Maguire any day of the week.. Maguire a massive NO from me

 

[simon23]

stons is better than McGuire in most aspects excepting heading.

 

[Blue Hefner]

would rather have stones than Maguire any day of the week.. Maguire a massive NO from me

If we could get him for a decent price then I’d say fair enough but for the transfer fee which has been talked about then no, absolutely not

I’d try and talk Otemendi in to staying and go for an old head who can do a job of 18months until Garcia is ready. What’s Demichellis up to these days......

 

[doobyedoobye]

The money quoted for him is more than prohibitive. I can see United paying it though

 

[Franknorgrovesnephew]

if we are willing to pay his clause then surely go balls deep for de light instead

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

if we are willing to pay his clause then surely go balls deep for de light instead

Love to see him here, but not enough to want his agent anywhere near city.

 

[yankblue]

would rather have stones than Maguire any day of the week.. Maguire a massive NO from me

I would as well, just pointing out Stones has hardly been a first 11 mainstay.

 

[Mezrah]

Love to see him here, but not enough to want his agent anywhere near city.

His agent is named Barry Hulshoff. Raiola is working as a broker.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

His agent is named Barry Hulshoff. Raiola is working as a broker.

Whatever mate, still too close. The bloke is a parasite

 

[Ederson's smiley tattoo]

Otamendi is better than Maguire. Send that slabhead to the rags where mediocrity flourish