Harry Maguire

[city saint]

Please let them spend that on him, I’d have been mortified if we had.

we still might

 

[Keeper!]

We want him, he wants us.

It's up to him, but will he ask for a transfer?

 

[Stoned Rose]

If we’re out he’d be best staying at Leicester.

Going to the swamp would be pointless.

Imagine having to partner Lindleof.

 

[Banned Tosspot]

I'd lose a bit of faith in Pep if we sign this overrated lump.

 

[laserblue]

A clear run at a player Eddie will end up paying £100 million for despite having no competition. After Pogba, Sanchez and Fred it looks more and more like a City piss take.

 

[Iantaff]

He’s overpriced and makes too many errors. Let United have him. They’ll overpay for him, give him a ridiculous wage and he’ll flop. Seems to be a pattern that they have to beat us to a big name signing, and we show a bit of dignity and leave them to it. Then they puff their chests out at United’s awesome ability to overpay, and the player ends up a useless lump. Maguire isn’t a Kompany or a Van Djick. Let them get on with it.

 

[Topbins]

A clear run at a player Eddie will end up paying £100 million for despite having no competition. After Pogba, Sanchez and Fred it looks more and more like a City piss take.

I don't think City spend their time driving up the transfer fees for players like Pogba, Sanchez and Fred, to make them even more rich than they already are with the signing on fee.
If that's the case it didn't work out to well with VD at Liverpool.
Sanchez and Fred chose Utd over City simple as that whether it was due to more money doesn't really matter they chose Utd.
I think if City were deliberately driving up transfer fees most clubs would have got wise to it by now. City aren't the only club out there who doesn't like to be messed about.
This conspiracy theory about City driving up transfer fees for Utd is synonymous with the well worn "we didn't want him anyway."

 

[Rammy Blue]

I don't think City spend their time driving up the transfer fees for players like Pogba, Sanchez and Fred, to make them even more rich than they already are with the signing on fee.
If that's the case it didn't work out to well with VD at Liverpool.
Sanchez and Fred chose Utd over City simple as that whether it was due to more money doesn't really matter they chose Utd.
I think if City were deliberately driving up transfer fees most clubs would have got wise to it by now. City aren't the only club out there who doesn't like to be messed about.
This conspiracy theory about City driving up transfer fees for Utd is synonymous with the well worn "we didn't want him anyway."

Claptrap.

Sanchez and Fred didn’t choose scum over us, we walked away before it got to that point.

 

[waspish]

think the rags are waiting till they sell Lukaku or pogba before paying the fee Leicester want.

 

[Topbins]

Claptrap.

Sanchez and Fred didn’t choose scum over us, we walked away before it got to that point.

Case in point. No player is ever allowed to reject City, walk away, pulled the deal, its all semantics. The player ultimately has refused to sign for whatever reason. This constant need to rationalise every rejection reminds of Utd, when we were signing yaya, Silva, aguero etc. Mercenaries they've only gone for the money.
It was Utter tripe and so are these endless streams of excuses City fans peddle out to frame the reason why they hope a player they don't like does not come or worse when a player we have been after chooses another club.