Hazard (continued)

[Dj1979]

Re: Our owner's reaction should Hazard go elsewhere as expected

Seeing Abramovich is supporting FFP but is also going on another spending spree we should start testing the water a bit more.

There's a thread on the general football forum about Chelsea and the ffp rule. Seems its not going to be a big problem for them either in fact they reckon they can spend the heavy end of 70 million and still get through it. With drogba leaving they free up a huge chunk of wages and if they pay the 32 mil figure that only just over 6 mil a year over a 5 year deal so not that much either

 

[Marvin]

If he goes to Chelsea it tells you that he didn't think he would get in our team either

 

[TonyM]

Hope is like soap, it rhymes with dope.

 

[southern muppet]

Has Dave Whelan not revealed this one yet?

 

[Tron Coltrane]

Has Ollie Holt tweeted any sort of update?

All he said was "Ad hominum"

 

[Rammyblues]

I believe he will sign for us. If he doesn't we get someone else.

 

[Danamy]

hazard and his agent are playing a clever game. by saying hes made up his mind but yet to reveal still gives the other clubs a chance to up there offer.
for all we know he might not have told any club hes signing for them and all 3 clubs think hes signing for 1 of the other 2.

He's messing with the wrong animal if he thinks he's going to get a chew out of us.

We've got a big stack of chips waiting on the table, we wont be raising anymore on this hand, we'll just bide our time and wait for the next deal and flop

 

[80s Shorts]

Careful guys. Keyboard warrior about.

It was a lie, he has never said he prefers the rags and if you are gullible to believe anything "attributed" to him in the press then more fool you. Now if you call me a prat again, I'll call in a favour of damocles, get your IP address, hunt you down and feed you to my dog.

In reality, ad hominem is unrelated to sarcasm or personal abuse. Argumentum ad hominem is the logical fallacy of attempting to undermine a speaker's argument by attacking the speaker instead of addressing the argument.

Yes, such as not answering and simply labelling me a prat to undermine my point.

We can all copy and paste though, so well done for that. Maybe you should read what you copy in future.

You misunderstand the meaning mate. His insult was separate to the point. His simply called you a prat as he was pissed off with you. That is not Ad Hominem, and as you like to use it so much then I thought you would like to know its true meaning.

He did not use the word prat to undermine your argument. Hence no Ad Hominem.

EG.

"How can you be against immigration when your grandparents came from Pakistan". Is Ad Hominem


"Who are you to tell me to stop using heroin after what you did in the sixties". Is Ad Hominem.

Hope that helps


Just noticed your last sentence lol.

That is a perfect example of Ad Hominem.

 

[TonyM]

Can sky not ask Harry?

 

[Ray78]

Re: Our owner's reaction should Hazard go elsewhere as expected

Seeing Abramovich is supporting FFP but is also going on another spending spree we should start testing the water a bit more.

There's a thread on the general football forum about Chelsea and the ffp rule. Seems its not going to be a big problem for them either in fact they reckon they can spend the heavy end of 70 million and still get through it. With drogba leaving they free up a huge chunk of wages and if they pay the 32 mil figure that only just over 6 mil a year over a 5 year deal so not that much either

Thanks for the heads up. It looks like he playing Russian Roulette then.