I think what I have said has been taken out of context somewhat. I'm all for actual safety measures to be imposed, but get frustrated when its construed as an over eager employer "enforcing" stringent measures on their employees when the actual reason is the stringent regulations being imposed on the employer who in turn have to impose the same on their employees.
As you Blue Panther. I have no issue with the claims that are valid, however, (and as a defendant solicitor for the "cowboy firms" that you refer to) I can say that this week I have seen claims for the following injuries:
A Paper Cut....
Bruised backside for falling off of a chair...
And the best one, is for flea bites...
Now the people that take these cases, the people that claim these "injuries" are the people that drive yours and my insurance premiums up across the board. The money to pay these spurious claims doesnt come from some magical pot somewhere does it?
Lord Jackson seems to have got his teeth into these rogue practices, and lets hope (in my world anyway) that these scheister firms get run into the ground.
Rant over.