He's Back!

Re: He's Back!!!!!

Another Gooner.

Whisper it not but the Greed Is Good League this season have verged on mediocrity. Both Manchester City and Manchester United, who went head to head until the very last day, for all their relative wealth, were badly shown up in both European competitions. Arsenal, though they were much weakened by the loss all season of Jack Wilshere – as indeed were England – shipped an embarrassing amount of water both in the early and the latter stages of the Premier League. If Manchester City were to take the title, it must surely be said that they bought it, in the process utterly distorting the balance of the competition; still more than Chelsea with Roman Abramovich’s money, had done before them and to a substantial attempt continued to do.

When you have enough money to pay Yaya Toure, the two-goal hero of the triumph at Newcastle, £200,000 a week. When you can enlist the dazzling likes of Sergio Aguero, Carlos Tevez, when he deigns to play, Silva, Barry, Dzeko and even the incorrigible Mario Balotelli, what should you do but win? And City very nearly didn’t do it. Dropping points galore to immensely less wealthy opposition. It has surprised me to see how some correspondents have actually lauded the way City have been able to spend such colossal amounts of Middle Eastern money. One was surprised too by the encomia for Roberto Mancini. What manager with so much money to spend could have failed to build a powerful team?

Embarrassing though it may be, one remembers how Mancini’s strange team selection in Munich, in the European so called Champions Cup, when he dropped an effective centre back to substitute him with one so far from match fitness condemned City to defeat in Munich. As for United, that 6-1 defeat at home by Manchester City was a shocking stain on their season. The fact that Ferguson felt obliged to exhume the 37-year-old Paul Scholes to reinforce his midfield said all too much about his team building programme. And then to throw poor Scholes on to the pitch as a far from match fit substitute, against all expectation, promptly seeing him give away the ball and a goal, was an embarrassment. Even if Scholes, so splendidly resilient, did quickly settle down to play influentially.

True, United did give Arsenal that 8-2 thrashing at Old Trafford, but in mitigation, one should remember that this was an Arsenal team packed with reserves! As for Tottenham and Harry Redknapp, an earlier splendid spell ground almost to a halt in the closing weeks of the season and the 5-1 FA Cup semi final defeat at Wembley by Chelsea was a dreadful humiliation, even if that scandalous Chelsea goal should never have been given by the inept referee, Martin Atkinson.

Yes, Harry was the People’s Choice for manager of England but I think he may have had a lucky escape. Even in retrospect, it is hard to understand how he condemned a plainly struggling centre back in William Gallas to persevere for the whole Wembley match, having been almost contemptuously brushed aside by Didier Drogba, who scored that first Chelsea goal.

Roy Hodgson, meanwhile, is still the object of what the scientist Pavlov might have called alternating stimuli. Varying from contemptible criticisms of his accent, to a despicable attempt by reporters who should have known better to cull negative responses at Bayern Munich from manager Jupp Heynckes and such players as Lahm and Schweinsteiger . The irony being, as it quickly emerged, that Roy could probably have managed the German international team had he not kept his bargain with Blackburn Rovers; destined to sack him anyway. So much for loyalty.

No, I cannot believe that England under Roy, or anybody else for that matter, will do anything of note in the coming Euros. Already team and manager have a ball and chain around the leg with the absence of Wayne Rooney, the sole English striker of real quality, from the first two games. If England get through their qualifying group with the resources they have it would surely be a substantial achievement.

Meanwhile, England fans will doubtless be reassured by an official warning that Ukrainian police could both beat and rob them. Happy days to come
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

Dear God. What a miserable bastard. Why doesn't he just do us all a favour and end it all if he is so depressed about football?



carlos92 said:
Another Gooner.

Whisper it not but the Greed Is Good League this season have verged on mediocrity. Both Manchester City and Manchester United, who went head to head until the very last day, for all their relative wealth, were badly shown up in both European competitions. Arsenal, though they were much weakened by the loss all season of Jack Wilshere – as indeed were England – shipped an embarrassing amount of water both in the early and the latter stages of the Premier League. If Manchester City were to take the title, it must surely be said that they bought it, in the process utterly distorting the balance of the competition; still more than Chelsea with Roman Abramovich’s money, had done before them and to a substantial attempt continued to do.

When you have enough money to pay Yaya Toure, the two-goal hero of the triumph at Newcastle, £200,000 a week. When you can enlist the dazzling likes of Sergio Aguero, Carlos Tevez, when he deigns to play, Silva, Barry, Dzeko and even the incorrigible Mario Balotelli, what should you do but win? And City very nearly didn’t do it. Dropping points galore to immensely less wealthy opposition. It has surprised me to see how some correspondents have actually lauded the way City have been able to spend such colossal amounts of Middle Eastern money. One was surprised too by the encomia for Roberto Mancini. What manager with so much money to spend could have failed to build a powerful team?

Embarrassing though it may be, one remembers how Mancini’s strange team selection in Munich, in the European so called Champions Cup, when he dropped an effective centre back to substitute him with one so far from match fitness condemned City to defeat in Munich. As for United, that 6-1 defeat at home by Manchester City was a shocking stain on their season. The fact that Ferguson felt obliged to exhume the 37-year-old Paul Scholes to reinforce his midfield said all too much about his team building programme. And then to throw poor Scholes on to the pitch as a far from match fit substitute, against all expectation, promptly seeing him give away the ball and a goal, was an embarrassment. Even if Scholes, so splendidly resilient, did quickly settle down to play influentially.

True, United did give Arsenal that 8-2 thrashing at Old Trafford, but in mitigation, one should remember that this was an Arsenal team packed with reserves! As for Tottenham and Harry Redknapp, an earlier splendid spell ground almost to a halt in the closing weeks of the season and the 5-1 FA Cup semi final defeat at Wembley by Chelsea was a dreadful humiliation, even if that scandalous Chelsea goal should never have been given by the inept referee, Martin Atkinson.

Yes, Harry was the People’s Choice for manager of England but I think he may have had a lucky escape. Even in retrospect, it is hard to understand how he condemned a plainly struggling centre back in William Gallas to persevere for the whole Wembley match, having been almost contemptuously brushed aside by Didier Drogba, who scored that first Chelsea goal.

Roy Hodgson, meanwhile, is still the object of what the scientist Pavlov might have called alternating stimuli. Varying from contemptible criticisms of his accent, to a despicable attempt by reporters who should have known better to cull negative responses at Bayern Munich from manager Jupp Heynckes and such players as Lahm and Schweinsteiger . The irony being, as it quickly emerged, that Roy could probably have managed the German international team had he not kept his bargain with Blackburn Rovers; destined to sack him anyway. So much for loyalty.

No, I cannot believe that England under Roy, or anybody else for that matter, will do anything of note in the coming Euros. Already team and manager have a ball and chain around the leg with the absence of Wayne Rooney, the sole English striker of real quality, from the first two games. If England get through their qualifying group with the resources they have it would surely be a substantial achievement.

Meanwhile, England fans will doubtless be reassured by an official warning that Ukrainian police could both beat and rob them. Happy days to come
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

halfcenturyup said:
Dear God. What a miserable bastard. Why doesn't he just do us all a favour and end it all if he is so depressed about football?



carlos92 said:
Another Gooner.

Whisper it not but the Greed Is Good League this season have verged on mediocrity. Both Manchester City and Manchester United, who went head to head until the very last day, for all their relative wealth, were badly shown up in both European competitions. Arsenal, though they were much weakened by the loss all season of Jack Wilshere – as indeed were England – shipped an embarrassing amount of water both in the early and the latter stages of the Premier League. If Manchester City were to take the title, it must surely be said that they bought it, in the process utterly distorting the balance of the competition; still more than Chelsea with Roman Abramovich’s money, had done before them and to a substantial attempt continued to do.

When you have enough money to pay Yaya Toure, the two-goal hero of the triumph at Newcastle, £200,000 a week. When you can enlist the dazzling likes of Sergio Aguero, Carlos Tevez, when he deigns to play, Silva, Barry, Dzeko and even the incorrigible Mario Balotelli, what should you do but win? And City very nearly didn’t do it. Dropping points galore to immensely less wealthy opposition. It has surprised me to see how some correspondents have actually lauded the way City have been able to spend such colossal amounts of Middle Eastern money. One was surprised too by the encomia for Roberto Mancini. What manager with so much money to spend could have failed to build a powerful team?

Embarrassing though it may be, one remembers how Mancini’s strange team selection in Munich, in the European so called Champions Cup, when he dropped an effective centre back to substitute him with one so far from match fitness condemned City to defeat in Munich. As for United, that 6-1 defeat at home by Manchester City was a shocking stain on their season. The fact that Ferguson felt obliged to exhume the 37-year-old Paul Scholes to reinforce his midfield said all too much about his team building programme. And then to throw poor Scholes on to the pitch as a far from match fit substitute, against all expectation, promptly seeing him give away the ball and a goal, was an embarrassment. Even if Scholes, so splendidly resilient, did quickly settle down to play influentially.

True, United did give Arsenal that 8-2 thrashing at Old Trafford, but in mitigation, one should remember that this was an Arsenal team packed with reserves! As for Tottenham and Harry Redknapp, an earlier splendid spell ground almost to a halt in the closing weeks of the season and the 5-1 FA Cup semi final defeat at Wembley by Chelsea was a dreadful humiliation, even if that scandalous Chelsea goal should never have been given by the inept referee, Martin Atkinson.

Yes, Harry was the People’s Choice for manager of England but I think he may have had a lucky escape. Even in retrospect, it is hard to understand how he condemned a plainly struggling centre back in William Gallas to persevere for the whole Wembley match, having been almost contemptuously brushed aside by Didier Drogba, who scored that first Chelsea goal.

Roy Hodgson, meanwhile, is still the object of what the scientist Pavlov might have called alternating stimuli. Varying from contemptible criticisms of his accent, to a despicable attempt by reporters who should have known better to cull negative responses at Bayern Munich from manager Jupp Heynckes and such players as Lahm and Schweinsteiger . The irony being, as it quickly emerged, that Roy could probably have managed the German international team had he not kept his bargain with Blackburn Rovers; destined to sack him anyway. So much for loyalty.

No, I cannot believe that England under Roy, or anybody else for that matter, will do anything of note in the coming Euros. Already team and manager have a ball and chain around the leg with the absence of Wayne Rooney, the sole English striker of real quality, from the first two games. If England get through their qualifying group with the resources they have it would surely be a substantial achievement.

Meanwhile, England fans will doubtless be reassured by an official warning that Ukrainian police could both beat and rob them. Happy days to come

Yep written by 'respected football writer' Brian Glanville.
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

Prestwich_Blue said:
Really pisses me off that people simply don't have a clue about (a) FFP and (b) where City are going as a business. Fuck 'em. They'll find out how ignorant and stupid they were in 2 or 3 years.
Indeed
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

Brian Glanville is a tiresome and pompous bore.

Another point that this blogger conspicuously fails to appreciate is that a system that spawns the imperative for the extensive marketing of clubs (which he appears so enthusiastic about), makes the intervention of people like Sheikh Mansour inevitable.

Where there is a platform to disseminate a product globally it is unavoidable. I make no comment as to the desirability of such a state of affairs, but it is naive to say the least, to fail to understand that rich and powerful men have always used whatever vehicle is available for financial and strategic ends.

The way modern football is marketed and its global reach, which is seen as a virtue by that blogger, makes its exploitation by global playmakers an inevitable consequence.

It was the same with newspapers before the rise of the internet. Plus ca change.
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

I just wish he would learn the difference between "their" (possessive) and "there" as in "over there" Sorry to be the grammar police, but it's just so annoying that otherwise intelligent people were too lazy to learn how to spell.
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

Prestwich_Blue said:
Really pisses me off that people simply don't have a clue about (a) FFP and (b) where City are going as a business. Fuck 'em. They'll find out how ignorant and stupid they were in 2 or 3 years.


This 100%
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

cleavers said:
Dribble said:
My Response:
You’re still a bitter twisted prick. I wouldn’t spare you my piss if you were on fire!!!!!
Very constructive is name calling, just a thought, have you thought about debating some of the bullshit replies he's posted (because he clearly still doesn't get it), that would be more constructive.
If you'd read his original blog, you'd have seen that I did respond to his ill-informed diatribe. TBH this response blog was a further entrenchment of his original blog albeit an attempt to soften the tone somewhat.

All in all, he had an opportunity to respond to my orginal retort to which he chose not to probably because he didn't have anything worthwhile & informed to say. Hence I didn't want to get into a debate with this obviously hate riddled, soap box merchant & therefore I gave him the response I believe his response deserved.

It was only his first attempt as a blogger & as someone else has already said in regard to this sad deluded character, 'when you hit rock bottom, it's best to stop digging'!!! He'd be well advised to heed that advice & give up his fledgling career as a blogger before he digs himself into such a deep hole that he emerges in Australia.....
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

All that time to reply to his utterly shite first article and all he proves i s that he really does know fuck all about
A) Football
B) Finances
 
Re: He's Back!!!!!

gordondaviesmoustache said:
He criticises us for spending money above what we generate from turnover and contrasts it with united.

How the fuck does he think they got to where they are today?.That is precisely what they did in the late eighties and early nineties. It is like some rabid royalist trying to deny that our Royal Family's right to rule didn't originate at the point of a sword several hundred years ago and was instead decreed by god.

It has always faintly amused me when people pontificate about the good of the game and at the same time see a virtue in success being a direct function of shirt sales in Asia, as if that is some meaningful measure of the Corinthian spirit. They equate a club's worth to compete on the pitch with the efficacy of their marketing department. Do they realise how absurd that sounds in sporting terms?


excellent!
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.