Home grown players (merged)

Re: Transfer Policy - English players

NipHolmes said:
The barefaced cheek of Pardew and Newcastle complaining about the cost of young English players, after they sold Carrol for a whopping £35m. Golden hypocrisy.
Fair point and one which equally adds to the inflationary aspect of HG player transfer fees.

What the FA & UEFA should do is remove the HG quota and see how quickly the cost of British talent falls. Now that's what I call a fair market economy.

Forcing this quota onto clubs just to help the England team does nothing to help the situation apart from artificially forcing the price of the average to best British talent beyond the ridiculous........

They say something is only worth what someone is willing to pay for it, but even this logic is removed when people are forced to overpay for a commodity solely because it's British.
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

FanchesterCity said:
ColinLee said:
FanchesterCity said:
Thought he said top 4 team
at one of our top clubs
which could be pretty much anyone, even the rags at a stretch.

True enough. I'd envisaged current top 4, but you're right - rivalry aside, they're a top club
Perhaps I should have put a smiley at the end...
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

Dribble said:
FanchesterCity said:
I'm curious, where's this long history of producing talent?

Southampton have in recent years produced:

Theo Walcott
Gareth Bale
Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain
Adam Lallana
Wayne Bridge
Luke Shaw

Now, that's not a bad list, but it's not earth shattering either. Every now and then a club has a spate of great talent - just like United did with their golden generation, and at THAT time, everybody harped on about how good United's youth system was... then it dried up. We had the same for a while, a batch of great lads coming through like David White and Paul Lake and even before that, we were considered a decent producer of young lads, but it dried up too (not completely, but in comparison with our youth hey day).

With Crewe, the picture is definitely clearer - they did have a quite impressive record of young lads who went through them, but still, quite a few of them were actually taken up by other bigger clubs first, then dropped and sent off or transferred to Crewe. It wasn't like Crewe 'found' them.

I take your point that our super academy isn't going to ruin football and other academies will still exist, but surely if ours is to work, it's going to be capturing more talent from somewhere - we aren't going to develop players from magic dust. Those players we'll grab would have been going elsewhere until we diverted them to us. But say 40 years ago, the facilities difference (for young lads) between Man City and Oldham Athletic would be fairly minimal, the gap now is huge - since PL youth are getting all the trappings and facilities of PL stars (which might be part of our national youth problem!).
That list may not be earth shattering, but it's not shit either considering it contains the most expensive player in the world. I don't think there's one magic bullet that can transform an academy overnight, I believe that a holistic ethos needs to be created that runs like a river throughout the club in question and that ethos needs to be based on skill and tactics from the very earliest ages.

During this World Cup, its been sobering to see how comfortable many of the players are from footballing countries considered below England in the FIFA rankings. I agree wholeheartedly with Vieira's assertions that in England winning at youth level seems to be more important than skill and tactics and there's a lot to be said for that.

The thing that has stood out for most during this World Cup is that teams are trying to win to progress rather than not to lose which is great to see. Seeing the ball being played out from the back and defenders being comfortable enough to bring it forward and develop play from there has also been another stand out element of this World Cup.

In youth football a ruling was recently brought in that when a goal keeper has the ball, the opposition team has to stay in their own half as a way of encouraging teams in possession to play from the back instead of hoofing it up the pitch to the big kid playing up front. I've seen some brilliant matches at the youngest level, but it leaves me wondering what happens to them from such a tender age up until when they become young adults.

Children are children and just because a child is born in Rio, it doesn't automatically transpire that they will be blessed with more skill than a kid born in Rusholme. The skill mindset created by kids who've played Futsal and progressed on to become outstanding professional players also cannot be understated, but rather than something akin to Futsal being the norm in the UK, parents have to pay through the nose for specialist classes where its taught. Even then its mostly shit! I taken my son to two Futsal schools previously and despaired at the disorganised way both were run. I've ended up training him myself and got better results and saved money in the process.

In this country there still seems to be a preoccupation pace and power as opposed to skill and tactical awareness. With the riches on offer for a place in the Premier League, are teams ever going to put performances and an ethos before a win? Some how I think we'll have a very long wait indeed before we see that happening. Until then all I can see is further international disappointment just like this summer.

Totally agree. I think the difference between England and Brazil, Argentina etc.. is there are very few opportunities for most of them. Take boxing for example. It's always been dominated by the underprivileged. Here in the states there was times when it was Italian immigrants, Irish, Jews etc.. and now Blacks. Each group had a run and then as their opportunities grew you saw another group excel. I just don't think a lot of English or American kids for that matter want it bad enough. It's a bit too easy for them to play video games etc.. and go to school and get a regular job. Kids today don't like doing things that don't come easy to them. They don't want to do the little things. I remember a quote from a City player(can't remember if it was "Teenage Kicks" or "Looks Like Scunny Next Season"(I read a lot and tend to get books confused with each other) where the player talked about how when he was a kid kicking a ball against the wall and that being fun and how today's kids consider it work. Certainly in both books many talked about how doing the odd jobs around the club kept them grounded and that the pampering of the youth these days probably spoils them too much.
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

clearly the "English way" is not working, the solution is to use a non-English way. Either copy a good foreign system or just nationalise good foreign players!
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

ColinLee said:
Kippax Street 1880 said:
Milner is the only English player I want in the City team. Unlike the others he doesn't have a huge ego or is a flashy arrogant prick whose footballing ability is massively overrated. Besides, signing anyone half-decent and English costs an absolute fortune, just look at what United have paid for Shaw, crazy money. Until we develop our own Mancunian kids from the new academy I don't want us splashing silly money on overrated, overpriced English players just to fill a stupid fucking quota.
Have you forgotten Hart? Or maybe not?

Left out intentionally.

I'm not a fan.
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

People seem to be confusing 'home grown' with English. Not the same thing.

Of course if there's an English quota introduced into the PL then the academy will have to adjust to account for more English lads, but as it stands now, they can come from wherever we fancy.
 
Re: Transfer Policy - English players

FanchesterCity said:
People seem to be confusing 'home grown' with English. Not the same thing.

Of course if there's an English quota introduced into the PL then the academy will have to adjust to account for more English lads, but as it stands now, they can come from wherever we fancy.
Ths point is though that let's just say some of those HG kids just aren"t good enough for what we need, why should we be stopped from allowing those players to find a club at their level, whilst we find alternative players closer to ours.

If Sinclair, Richards, Rodwell don't suit our purposes, surely its better for the future of English football if they are playing regularly for Birmingham, Hull or WBA etc rather than being stuck with a top team just because they help to fill a ridiculous quota?

Like I've said already, as an idea to advance football & to make it fairer, the HG quota along with all forms of FFP are all fucked as workable solutions.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.