OB1
Well-Known Member
Yeah, at the end of the day I couldn't give a shit who likes who tbh. :)
I just don't get this 'Dark side of the moon is the greatest ever made' stuff.
It's not musically adventurous there is no dynamic musicianship on it, yes a few good tunes. But it's mainly slow, ploding and boring in my opinion.
I guess it would be good for sending me to sleep.
I really don't understand how it has got the status it holds.
Truly, I'm very much someone who thinks each to their own and I'm certainly not here to persuade anyone to listen to something else. I love music and love to talk about it. And just this week idahoblues pointed out a band that's passed me buy but I've just ordered three cds by them because I think they are worth investigating.
As to Floyd, they are a band that has grown on me over the years, and I mean a lot of years. I've owned DSOTM since (IIRC) 1974 and a couple of girlfriends owned WYWH and I listened to that a lot and have always loved it but I was fairly dismissive of them in general until 1987. They are by no means my favourite band but they are reasonably high up the list these days.
I've got to get on with work now but one thing I'd say about DSOTM is that if you go to the states and listen to classic rock radio stations, you'll do well to go through a day without hearing something from DSOTM: it's popularity is huge. It's songs have staying power. I still think it is one of the best produced albums I have ever heard.