How low will the Hughes outers go

[Failsworth_Blue]

Come on!we've had the rumours involving Ireland & Hughes that escalated to mountain proportions, we've had the Jim Cassell stomping around Carrington in disgust at the way City have treated him bullshit.
All made up & pretty low so what's next ??????????
Do you have a limit.

It's a few posters posting those kind of things so lets not tar everyone with the same brush. You be happy with 7 draws on the run and i'll be disappointed and post on here but will still get behind Hughes and the players at the match hoping we win every game and i'm sure that goes for most of the posters on here

 

[Gelsons Dad]

We've seen the vile shite they have posted about Jim Cassell & the way they are now trying to dig themselves out of the hole they have dug by saying he has been bought off.
We also know that the majority of them as admitted have no other reason for coming on here other than to post & start threads about getting rid of our manager.
We also know that these people want City to lose against Arsenal & Chelski because then they can do what they enjoy doing more than ever.
So the question is what next ??????
If Colin Bell makes a statement in the media giving backing to our manager & other ex-players do the same will they/you turn on them like you have turned on Jim Cassell

I would like an apology please!
It's no secret that I don't think MH is the right man for the job. However, I don't contribute to rumour threads, I mostly post on Off topic and only contribute to Hughes out threads when I feel there is a need to add weight to the perceived numbers and I never want city to loose.

Your perception of "Hughes Outers" (I hate that term) is obviously clouded by your own view of what's good for the club. A view which my not be shared by other fans.

 

[bluemanc]

We've seen the vile shite they have posted about Jim Cassell & the way they are now trying to dig themselves out of the hole they have dug by saying he has been bought off.
We also know that the majority of them as admitted have no other reason for coming on here other than to post & start threads about getting rid of our manager.
We also know that these people want City to lose against Arsenal & Chelski because then they can do what they enjoy doing more than ever.
So the question is what next ??????
If Colin Bell makes a statement in the media giving backing to our manager & other ex-players do the same will they/you turn on them like you have turned on Jim Cassell

I would like an apology please!
It's no secret that I don't think MH is the right man for the job. However, I don't contribute to rumour threads, I mostly post on Off topic and only contribute to Hughes out threads when I feel there is a need to add weight to the perceived numbers and I never want city to loose.

Your perception of "Hughes Outers" (I hate that term) is obviously clouded by your own view of what's good for the club. A view which my not be shared by other fans.

You have my apology Sir as do all the other likeminded Blues that got tarred with "that" brush.
I'm sick of the twats so i thought fuck it have a bit of that,i'm afraid people do get hit by friendly fire,no disrespect intended to you & your like....but a lot meant to the fuckwits.

 

[Anonymous]

Come on!we've had the rumours involving Ireland & Hughes that escalated to mountain proportions, we've had the Jim Cassell stomping around Carrington in disgust at the way City have treated him bullshit.
All made up & pretty low so what's next ??????????
Do you have a limit.

Whilst I agree that it's not right to make stuff up just to have a go at Hughes, what isn't fabricated (& is therefore what most Hughes doubters are concentrating on) is our poor form & probably more importantly our new 'style' of playing.

 

[Gelsons Dad]

I would like an apology please!
It's no secret that I don't think MH is the right man for the job. However, I don't contribute to rumour threads, I mostly post on Off topic and only contribute to Hughes out threads when I feel there is a need to add weight to the perceived numbers and I never want city to loose.

Your perception of "Hughes Outers" (I hate that term) is obviously clouded by your own view of what's good for the club. A view which my not be shared by other fans.

You have my apology Sir as do all the other likeminded Blues that got tarred with "that" brush.
I'm sick of the twats so i thought fuck it have a bit of that,i'm afraid people do get hit by friendly fire,no disrespect intended to you & your like....but a lot meant to the fuckwits.

Accepted.
Thank You.

 

[bluemanc]

Come on!we've had the rumours involving Ireland & Hughes that escalated to mountain proportions, we've had the Jim Cassell stomping around Carrington in disgust at the way City have treated him bullshit.
All made up & pretty low so what's next ??????????
Do you have a limit.

Whilst I agree that it's not right to make stuff up just to have a go at Hughes, what isn't fabricated (& is therefore what most Hughes doubters are concentrating on) is our poor form & probably more importantly our new 'style' of playing.

what most Hughes doubters are concentrating on) is our poor form & probably more importantly our new 'style' of playing.

I'm not sure wether it was you or another mod who started a thread like that yesterday & we NEARLY had a football thread on our hands,but the same scrotes ripped it to fuckin bits.
I fuckin miss those type of threads bigtime.

 

[Anonymous]

Whilst I agree that it's not right to make stuff up just to have a go at Hughes, what isn't fabricated (& is therefore what most Hughes doubters are concentrating on) is our poor form & probably more importantly our new 'style' of playing.

what most Hughes doubters are concentrating on) is our poor form & probably more importantly our new 'style' of playing.

I'm not sure wether it was you or another mod who started a thread like that yesterday & we NEARLY had a football thread on our hands,but the same scrotes ripped it to fuckin bits.
I fuckin miss those type of threads bigtime.

Yeah, it was mine. The one titled "I don't care that we've drawn 7 on the trot".

Unfortunately, there will always be posters on both sides of any argument that will twist things to their advantage. In the case of the Hughes debate those who are against him will jump on anything bad happening at the club and blame it on him, and those who are in favour of him will accuse others of being rags and not 'proper' fans. What both sides of the debate should realise is that as soon as you resort to this kind of stuff it just weakens your argument rather than strengthen it.

 

[cleavers]

We've seen the vile shite they have posted about Jim Cassell & the way they are now trying to dig themselves out of the hole they have dug by saying he has been bought off.
We also know that the majority of them as admitted have no other reason for coming on here other than to post & start threads about getting rid of our manager.
We also know that these people want City to lose against Arsenal & Chelski because then they can do what they enjoy doing more than ever.
So the question is what next ??????
If Colin Bell makes a statement in the media giving backing to our manager & other ex-players do the same will they/you turn on them like you have turned on Jim Cassell

I havnt posted any shite about JC
I post on many different threads
I hope we stuff Arsenal and Chelski

And i think you'll find this accounts for AT LEAST 95% of the Hughes outers. Now get down the pub for a Sunday beer.

Good response, I'm the same, I even want MH to turn it round, I just can't see any signs he will, and since we now resemble his old Blackburn but with less organisation, I will continue to say what I want, and ignore posters like bluemanc, who only want to kill freedom of speech.

 

[bluemanc]

I havnt posted any shite about JC
I post on many different threads
I hope we stuff Arsenal and Chelski

And i think you'll find this accounts for AT LEAST 95% of the Hughes outers. Now get down the pub for a Sunday beer.

Good response, I'm the same, I even want MH to turn it round, I just can't see any signs he will, and since we now resemble his old Blackburn but with less organisation, I will continue to say what I want, and ignore posters like bluemanc, who only want to kill freedom of speech.

posters like bluemanc, who only want to kill freedom of speech.

I don't want to kill freedom of speech i just want it to be me that has the freedom to speak.

 

[cleavers]

I don't want to kill freedom of speech i just want it to be me that has the freedom to speak.

Good.

However I respectfully suggest that you read your original post again then, because that is exactly how it came over to me. NEVER have I (or 99% of those who don't rate MH) said they want us to lose, I've certainly not said anything about Cassell, he's entitled to any view he wants.

Your words.....

We also know that the majority of them as admitted have no other reason for coming on here other than to post & start threads about getting rid of our manager.
We also know that these people want City to lose against Arsenal & Chelski because then they can do what they enjoy doing more than ever.