How low will the Hughes outers go

In fairness Blue Manc some of the comments from both sides have been over the top. Debating is one thing but I can never understand the personal attacks on fellow fans as ultimately we both want what is best for the club, just we see the pathway to get there as being quiet different. Fans will always speculate and make observations like you have said about Cassell and on the other hand Hughes inners have blamed Elano for everything that was wrong at the club, and that Robinho would never play for us again a few weeks ago.
 
cleavers said:
bluemanc said:
I don't want to kill freedom of speech i just want it to be me that has the freedom to speak.

Good.

However I respectfully suggest that you read your original post again then, because that is exactly how it came over to me. NEVER have I (or 99% of those who don't rate MH) said they want us to lose, I've certainly not said anything about Cassell, he's entitled to any view he wants.

Your words.....

bluemanc said:
We also know that the majority of them as admitted have no other reason for coming on here other than to post & start threads about getting rid of our manager.
We also know that these people want City to lose against Arsenal & Chelski because then they can do what they enjoy doing more than ever.
99% now that's silly & if you think that a good few of the extremer elements of the Hughes outers wouldnt be happy to see us lose against the arse & chelski & see Hughes go then you have not seen them admit that fact in past threads.
Perhaps a poll asking that question would be in order.......but would they tell the truth ??1 or 2 would as they have in the past the others wouldn't.
i just want it to be me that has the freedom to speak
Yep you have me with that one,what am i like,bit of a control freak eh!
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
whp.blue said:
not as low as your IQ you hypocrite

An argument, please, in the philosophical sense. Argue your corner, justify your statement. You have lost it the moment you key in any personal abuse.
BLUEMANC HAS A HISTORY OF VILE PERSONAL ABUSE WHILST HIDING BEHIND THE SAFETY OF HIS KEYBOARD !
 
whp.blue said:
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
An argument, please, in the philosophical sense. Argue your corner, justify your statement. You have lost it the moment you key in any personal abuse.
BLUEMANC HAS A HISTORY OF VILE PERSONAL ABUSE WHILST HIDING BEHIND THE SAFETY OF HIS KEYBOARD !
So how low will you go ???????
Will you go as low as those that are now trying to fill the board with Hughes out threads & lying about what they have heard from other people or do you have a limit ???simple question answer it.......your caps lock is on btw.
 
You do know that your are just making up these arguments? I see no evidence and I haven't read anything on here that suggest the shit you are posting. So now the hughes in people are lying and making up things? Great.
 
BlueSinclair said:
You do know that your are just making up these arguments? I see no evidence and I haven't read anything on here that suggest the shit you are posting. So now the hughes in people are lying and making up things? Great.
So now the hughes in people are lying and making up things
You are entitled to your opinion but you haven't looked hard enough.
The accusing the Hughes inners of LYING would if it was the other way round mean a threat of physical violence towards you, or do you not think that's true.
 
bluemanc said:
BlueSinclair said:
You do know that your are just making up these arguments? I see no evidence and I haven't read anything on here that suggest the shit you are posting. So now the hughes in people are lying and making up things? Great.
So now the hughes in people are lying and making up things
You are entitled to your opinion but you haven't looked hard enough.
The accusing the Hughes inners of LYING would if it was the other way round mean a threat of physical violence towards you, or do you not think that's true.

Utter gibberish. You are making a total cock of yourself - I suggest you put the bottle down, have a cup of coffee and get an early night.

If a manager is going to cause this much shite amongst the fans, I say it's another reason to get-rid!
 
pp_leroy_limbo.jpg
 
Bluemanc - I share your frustration with a lot of stuff which has been posted on bluemoon since pretty much the day Hughes arrived. The fervor with which he's been attacked at times has been staggering. People have over analyzed everything, and have tried to put a negative spin on everything he has done.

Personally I think much of it is linked to the fact that he was brought in by Dr Shinawatra to replace Sven, someone who had rightly or wrongly become a genuine fans favourite at City.

The problem you've got now, is that if you just blindly entrench yourself in the "we shouldn't criticize Mark Hughes" position, you're not going to see the genuine cracks. I think they are appearing now, not because of how bad he is, but because this City job is monumental. The expectation is monumental. The scrutiny is unbelievable. The egos are some of the biggest in world football. The dressing room is probably one of the toughest in world football. That's not a criticism of the players either, just a fact.

Hughes is still a very good manager IMO - but this job - is possibly a little too much too early for him.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.