The Mirror chose that number. Its not really relevant. The total is closer to 100M with him in it.and made far more than ten appearances for us! Closer to fifty at a guess.
The Mirror chose that number. Its not really relevant. The total is closer to 100M with him in it.and made far more than ten appearances for us! Closer to fifty at a guess.
The threads about the article, if we turn it in to players though the academy you could double the number but it's not, if it was the other clubs would have far more too.The Mirror chose that number. Its not really relevant. The total is closer to 100M with him in it.
Double it how?The threads about the article, if we turn it in to players though the academy you could double the number but it's not.
Iheanacho, SWP, Ireland, sturridge etcDouble it how?
I included Iheanacho and it wasn't built when SWP and Ireland were playing, or when they were youngsters.Iheanacho, SWP, Ireland etc
wasnt built? You do realise we had an academy before we built our new training ground?I included Iheanacho and it wasn't built when SWP and Ireland were playing, or when they were youngsters.
Deary me.wasnt built? You do realise we had an academy before we built our new training ground?
I dare say that's what most people said to themselves when they saw you add iheanacho - a player with 64 City appearances into a thread about players to have come through our academy and played less than 10 games for us.Deary me.
It's relevant to recouping the cost of the 'new' academy and you're still 80M short.I dare say that's what most people said to themselves when they saw you add iheanacho - a player with 64 City appearances into a thread about players to have come through our academy and played less than 10 games for us.
nobody apart from you has ever mentioned the new academy!It's relevant to recouping the cost of the 'new' academy and you're still 80M short.