KippaxNI said:
Ouch... Do I have the power to ban other mods?Matty said:Judging by the song you've quoted, I'd say 12.Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:My friends say I should act my age.
What's my age again?
Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:Ouch... Do I have the power to ban other mods?Matty said:Judging by the song you've quoted, I'd say 12.Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:My friends say I should act my age.
What's my age again?
Blink 182 were a formative influence on my teenage years thank you very much — and a much better offering than those tight-jeaned, spiky-haired mincers that the kids today listen to.
And the correct answer was 21.
pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.