You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
How old are you?
- Thread starter Fourinarow
- Start date
johnmc
Well-Known Member
KippaxNI said:
months obviously
Wheelsy
Well-Known Member
Ouch... Do I have the power to ban other mods?Matty said:Judging by the song you've quoted, I'd say 12.Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:My friends say I should act my age.
What's my age again?
Blink 182 were a formative influence on my teenage years thank you very much — and a much better offering than those tight-jeaned, spiky-haired mincers that the kids today listen to.
And the correct answer was 21.
scowy68
Well-Known Member
The big 40 last March for Scowy.
GStar
Well-Known Member
Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:Ouch... Do I have the power to ban other mods?Matty said:Judging by the song you've quoted, I'd say 12.Wheelsy OSC Sydney said:My friends say I should act my age.
What's my age again?
Blink 182 were a formative influence on my teenage years thank you very much — and a much better offering than those tight-jeaned, spiky-haired mincers that the kids today listen to.
And the correct answer was 21.
Here here, as a fellow 21 umm, "er". Blink 182 were by far better than any fashion indie shit being served up today.
GStar
Well-Known Member
pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
tueartsboots
Well-Known Member
GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
Excuse me, I'm 40 and have Blink, Bizkit, Creed and Linkin Park on my iPod !!!!! And I love it !!!
GStar
Well-Known Member
tueartsboots said:GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
Excuse me, I'm 40 and have Blink, Bizkit, Creed and Linkin Park on my iPod !!!!! And I love it !!!
Good stuff, i think i've all them on my ipod too, although i listened to Blink yesterday the rest not as much.
GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
I was about 15, i guess you were the same.
But nooooo, they were just bad. Stupid whiny voice. Urgh.
tueartsboots said:GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
Excuse me, I'm 40 and have Blink, Bizkit, Creed and Linkin Park on my iPod !!!!! And I love it !!!
Sum 41 aswell?
tueartsboots
Well-Known Member
pee dubya said:tueartsboots said:GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
Excuse me, I'm 40 and have Blink, Bizkit, Creed and Linkin Park on my iPod !!!!! And I love it !!!
Sum 41 aswell?
Might have next to my Scissor Sisters and ting tings :-/
tueartsboots said:pee dubya said:tueartsboots said:Excuse me, I'm 40 and have Blink, Bizkit, Creed and Linkin Park on my iPod !!!!! And I love it !!!
Sum 41 aswell?
Might have next to my Scissor Sisters and ting tings :-/
My mum likes the Scissor Sisters, and she's past 50. I don't know who the ting tings are.
Whatever floats your boat i suppose.
GStar
Well-Known Member
pee dubya said:GStar said:pee dubya said:Blink 182 were shite. Sorry, but we have to face facts, any bands that are widely popular purely in the 12-16 age range are, by definition, utter keech.
Limp Bizkit is another prime example.
And what age do you think we were when they were popular?
There's more than one objective of music. Some people like to go on a journey etc, so perhaps they listen to the Smiths. Others just want to have fun, thats what Blink catered for.
Oh and whether your a fan or Limp Bizkit or not their freaky painted guitarist and thier drummer were both very good musicians.
I was about 15, i guess you were the same.
But nooooo, they were just bad. Stupid whiny voice. Urgh.
Haha, true... but that was Tom, i preferd Mark's voice (oh dear god!)
I also have Sum 41 somewhere... but again haven't listened to it for a while.
It's mainly RHCP's for me again atm.
barryo
Well-Known Member
1.618034
Well-Known Member
johnmc said:28 with the penis of a 5 year old
Where do you keep this 5 year-old's penis? And more to the point, where did you get it from???