oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
stuart brennan said:Damocles said:stuart brennan said:The MEN tends to steer clear of such NotW type stories - can you name a sex scandal that we did give coverage to, unless it had a wider public interest?
We actually covered the Giggs story when it turned into a debate about the role of Twitter, and tge use or abuse of parliamentary privilege, here:
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1421660_twitter-gagging-row-i-have-no-regrets-over-naming-ryan-giggs-says-mp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... gs-says-mp</a>
Yet didn't feel the need to grant Stephen Ireland the same reverence in 2007 when his misdeeds came up on Bebo?
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/sport/football/manchester_city/s/1016955_city_play_down_ireland_web_talk" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... d_web_talk</a>
How is that relevant - surely a City player appearing to suggest he doesn't like football and got stuck playing it, is relevant?
We didn't carry anything about Mario's tangled love life, or any of the other sleazy stuff concerning City stars
-- Sun Oct 09, 2011 4:49 pm --
80s Shorts said:squirtyflower said:so a story with the headline 'bonkers balotelli' is more newsworthy than the longest serving player at stretford banging several women other than his wife and then trying to use the press to cover it up
lol you even continued the cover up after the ban had been lifted
Brennan has exposed himself as a fool, a liar or somebody with an agenda with his "NoTW" comment. The Giggs story was covered in every national tabloid and broadsheet.
No wonder they give brennans paper away for free.
Jesus H Christ! I said that we DID cover it. Have you clicked on the link, here it is again:
<a class="postlink" href="http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1421660_twitter-gagging-row-i-have-no-regrets-over-naming-ryan-giggs-says-mp" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://menmedia.co.uk/manchesterevening ... gs-says-mp</a>
We covered it in the same way the broadsheets covered it, not as a sex scandal but as a story of public interest
Waste of time Mr.B. It wouldn`t matter one iota what you wrote about the Blues,there are always some who are like sheep.
I bet half the fookers on here have NEVER read the MEN,but jumped on the gravy train with the ones who slag the paper off.
As a matter of interest,would it serve any purpose to either deny or admit that you do indeed support the Rags ?
Personally I couldn`t give a shit who you support,as long as you continue to give the Blues credit when due and remind the fans when something is wrong at the Club,something which IMO,you have done/tried for the number of years on your coverage.
To any idiots who believe I am a brown noser,I think you should look back over the time I been a Blue Mooner !! Always supported the MEN and its fair coverage of City,apart from that other Rag loving twat of a Sports Editor.
Over the past month or so,this is the first time I have seen any posts from SB,so I`m hardly kissing his backside.