Hughes OUT

[PaulPowerShower]

Hughes Out!! 3 days against 18 months. Same old mistakes week in week out, he's not good enough simple as that

1st manager to get us to a semi final since 1981

beaten once since august

great signings.....

what a numpty!

He is the only manager to have 680 billion quid to spend as well

His situation compered to his recent record is relative. If he would have had a shoestring to work with then the results would have been immense.

he has had access to some masive international superstars, which should be beating the likes of Burnley and Hull at home

 

[blueju]

jeez.....thank fook we have the tinternet. Where else would we read such enlightening information on our manager?

 

[the goats backside]

Judge at the end of the season the 7 draws equates to... 2 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, i know which i prefer and its better for team morale, we dont have a right to beat anyone

 

[moomba]

Judge at the end of the season the 7 draws equates to... 2 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, i know which i prefer and its better for team morale, we dont have a right to beat anyone

Both are a bad run of results given the level of the opposition. No right to beat anyone, but when you invest what we have you expect better than that IMO.

 

[the goats backside]

Judge at the end of the season the 7 draws equates to... 2 wins, 1 draw and 4 losses, i know which i prefer and its better for team morale, we dont have a right to beat anyone

 

[barney8]

Can't help thinking that a top manager would have achieved more with all those great players.

 

[KenTheLandlord]

Can't help thinking that a top manager would have achieved more with all those great players.

With examples such as letting go 2-0 lead against West Ham, or losing to Burnley, Wigan or Villa. In just plain old losing to City. Those type of top managers??

 

[fulhamroad22]

I believe City should at least be finishing 3rd with players they have signed and the money they have spent. Baring in mind Chelsea were 2nd in their first season if expenditure, 1st in their second year. City should be able to achieve something similar.

 

[squirtyflower]

I believe City should at least be finishing 3rd with players they have signed and the money they have spent. Baring in mind Chelsea were 2nd in their first season if expenditure, 1st in their second year. City should be able to achieve something similar.

As you keep reminding us
Chelsea were top 4 the year before

You can't have it both ways, then again, maybe you can!

 

[BingoBango]

I believe City should at least be finishing 3rd with players they have signed and the money they have spent. Baring in mind Chelsea were 2nd in their first season if expenditure, 1st in their second year. City should be able to achieve something similar.

Chelsea began from a much higher level than we were at when we came into the money, so I'm not sure that's a valid comparison.