Stoned Rose said:
I asked for them as I knew where you'd go with them. Which you did.
I answered your questions with answers you can't dispute. Hence you now taking your ball home.
Bless.
Ah we;l decided to bring my ball back. Taking your hypothetical point back to reality, Huddlestone didn't create four chances; he's credited with creating one and that was a pass well outside the box. Your reading of the game should have been able to tell you that Hull had less chances than City and their best one came about because of a Nastasic interception falling to Aluko in midfield.
I asked you to educate me as to why Huddlestone bossed midfield and you have singularly failed to do so. You claim to have answered some of my questions that intimate why he might not, IMO, have bossed midfield because of where I was going with stats about chances; except I don't need the stats about chances: I can list numerous good City chances from memory of the game, from things like Aguero dancing through the box and chipping tamely into McGregor's arms to Nasty nearly getting onto a late pass from Nasri into the six yard area (that won't appear in the chance stats but was one).
Chances was just one thing I threw in your direction. I view bossing the midfield as having a discernible positive influence on the game, yet Hull had less chances, less territorial advantage, less possession and no goals. However, a guy who completed 37 passes for Hull bossed the midfield. So what the devil did he do to boss midfield, keep the score down? Whoopee fucking do.
Yaya, who didn't boss the game, still did more to influence the game with two touches: an excellent pass out of defence as part of the move that created the first goal and a pearler of a free kick.
Now, where's my ball?