Huw Edwards - 6 month suspended sentence (pg 107)

For the last time, "public interest" is not dependent upon criminality.

It makes up 6 of the 7 IPSO justifications for public interest, the other being serious impropriety or incompetence towards the public, which this doesn't come under (Huw Edwards wasn't doing anything to the public at large)
 
Was that after Edwards had contacted him asking "what the hell have you done"? I think it was.

Like I say I am not defending the Sun - far from it, all I am doing is highlighting what I consider to be the BBC's ineptitude.

You haven't highlighted any ineptitude from the BBC at any point though.

In fact, all things considered the BBC didn't put a foot wrong, other than they devoted far too much coverage to it in a week dominated by much bigger news.
 
Was that after Edwards had contacted him asking "what the hell have you done"? I think it was.

Like I say I am not defending the Sun - far from it, all I am doing is highlighting what I consider to be the BBC's ineptitude.
 
You haven't highlighted any ineptitude from the BBC at any point though.
I consider not dealing with it when you have someone of of his stature being accused and them not raising the red flag to be a pretty poor show. Maybe we'll have to agree to differ on that.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.