Huw Edwards - 6 month suspended sentence (pg 107)

[cleavers]

It's on the front page of the BBC news website so yes. The Beeb never hideaway from reporting on themselves.

They report more stories on themselves than anything else.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

Presumably the person he sent the images to, must have reported him? He wasn't under police investigation prior to this was he?

 

[Two Gun Bob]

Why? That wasn't part of the discussion? Not sure it's in good faith. Not sure why you had to turn it into an argument

I regretfully missed out the word sadism. You are the grand master of arguments.

rather than just admit you'd made an assumption.

I did not make an assumption, you did.

You may be correct in your assumption. At no point have I said that your assumption is wrong.

You made an assumption that I had made an assumption.

We will have to find out when the trial takes place.

Indeed, but one thing we do know is he has been charged with possession and the distribution of 6 category A pictures, and cat A will still be defined as rape and or sadism toward a child.

Courts in recess. Goodnight Rumps:

 

[cleavers]

Presumably the person he sent the images to, must have reported him? He wasn't under police investigation prior to this was he?

It doesn't mean he sent them, he could have simply recieved them, same offence if they are on your device.

Did she say he was suffering with his mental wellbeing? I can't recall?

Yes, at the time she did.

 

[Mr Kobayashi]

I missed out the word sadism. And you are the grand master of arguments.

I did not make an assumption, you did.

It was a typo. Forgive me kobi.

Indeed we will, but one thing we will know is he is charged with 6 cat A pictures and cat A will still be defined as rape and or sadism toward a child. Again please forgive me for ommiting the word sadism.

Courts in recess. Goodnight Rumps : )

I've put you on ignore. Can't be bothered with your word salads anymore.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

It doesn't mean he sent them, he could have simply recieved them, same offence if they are on your device.



Yes, at the time she did.

I doubt they would actually charge you for opening something someone else sent you. How would you know what if was until you clicked on it?

Also staggering that the BBC
gave him a payrise when he hadn't worked for over half a year?

 

[cleavers]

I doubt they would actually charge you for opening something someone else sent you. How would you know what if was until you clicked on it?

They would if it's Cat A, by opening it, you "create" it unfortunately, so be careful what you open is the message, as you would likely be charged.

At a trial it will go to jury, with some mitigation obviously, so the outcome is not clear, charge and trial are different things.

 

[Churchlawtonblue]

They would if it's Cat A, by opening it, you "create" it unfortunately, so be careful what you open is the message, as you would likely be charged.

At a trial it will go to jury, with some mitigation obviously, so the outcome is not clear, charge and trial are different things.

Luckily no one send me that kind of stuff! I guess you have to circulate in certain friendship circles to receive such.

 

[york away to this!]

Perverts and paedos these days don't see to be any good with the camera.
They never seem to be able to take any "decent" photos of kids, from what I can see...

 

[Two Gun Bob]

I didn't mention sadism. You did. You're the only one who even discussed it. You're a bad faith poster.

He has been charged with being in the possession of and the distributution of six class A pictures via WhatsApp
Category A – Images involving penetrative sexual activity, sexual activity with an animal or sadism.