I am starting to dislike fellow blues

Balti said:
the usual small minority of posters pushing the same tired agenda desperately trying to garner support for their agenda driven views with sensationalist thread titles and stridently negative criticism which is manna from heaven for rags and journo's with an anti-City bias

attempting to take the moral high ground they claim that they are being insulted while patronising any who dare to disagree and inferring that anyone who doesn't share their view is an idiot

boring repetitive transparent divisive drivel mostly
Not to
Mention the old "most match going blues reckon"...... Crap
 
SWP's back said:
Balti said:
the usual small minority of posters pushing the same tired agenda desperately trying to garner support for their agenda driven views with sensationalist thread titles and stridently negative criticism which is manna from heaven for rags and journo's with an anti-City bias

attempting to take the moral high ground they claim that they are being insulted while patronising any who dare to disagree and inferring that anyone who doesn't share their view is an idiot

boring repetitive transparent divisive drivel mostly
Not to
Mention the old "most match going blues reckon"...... Crap

I know. Its almost as bad as quoting rag cafe. :-(
 
Prestwich_Blue said:
Ducado said:
I don't mind tactical discussions, but there are about 5 or 6 posters who have an agenda,
There you go again.

pmsl.

do what les dawson did, a class act at playing the piano badly apparently

i never got that to be honest..

my point is - spell badly with your other usernames

he'll sniff you out otherwise..
 
Balti said:
the usual small minority of posters pushing the same tired agenda desperately trying to garner support for their agenda driven views with sensationalist thread titles and stridently negative criticism which is manna from heaven for rags and journo's with an anti-City bias

attempting to take the moral high ground they claim that they are being insulted while patronising any who dare to disagree and inferring that anyone who doesn't share their view is an idiot

boring repetitive transparent divisive drivel mostly

Bang on the money is that.
 
My first thread after the derby was 'we were the better team', and incredibly positive and optimistic thread based on subjective views.

I was trying to add a different perspective in the sea of moans but doom and gloom merchants were quite pissed of our performance. The knee jerk though started to subside as the day began to see more positive threads albeit not as optimistic in hopes of not mocking the moanettes.

I still stand my ground. We had as much to moan about the game as the rags as we both nullified each other. Both teams had impeccable defense and caused a boring match. Yet, because I'm a blue, City came out the better team. Blue tinted specs and all. But so what. We're fourth and we look set to be a stronger contender this season I'm sure of it.
 
MCFC BOB said:
morleyswife said:
Bluemooners anyway
71% of threads have been negative after the Derby

I hope this forum does not reflect the % of season ticket holders with that statistic

Start supporting the team manager players and fellow realistic blues

You fucking instant win lottery scratch card porno tv instant fucking win bastards
How'd you work that out?

Yeah, come on MW, yer can't just come up with a rough old 71% - we want decimals, logarithms and formulae. And some pictures, and a video would be nice.
 
shaiomarali said:
My first thread after the derby was 'we were the better team', and incredibly positive and optimistic thread based on subjective views.

I was trying to add a different perspective in the sea of moans but doom and gloom merchants were quite pissed of our performance. The knee jerk though started to subside as the day began to see more positive threads albeit not as optimistic in hopes of not mocking the moanettes.

I still stand my ground. We had as much to moan about the game as the rags as we both nullified each other. Both teams had impeccable defense and caused a boring match. Yet, because I'm a blue, City came out the better team. Blue tinted specs and all. But so what. We're fourth and we look set to be a stronger contender this season I'm sure of it.

I don't know if I agree that we were the better team but I do think we played exactly how Roberto wanted us to and so in that sense we played very well. People who said we played shit because it wasn't to their liking don't understand defending is all part of the game. We've kept clean sheets against Chelsea, United, Liverpool and Spurs and if we do that again in the return fixtures we'll probably go very close to winning the league.
 
Dave Ewing's Back 'eader said:
MCFC BOB said:
How'd you work that out?

Yeah, come on MW, yer can't just come up with a rough old 71% - we want decimals, logarithms and formulae. And some pictures, and a video would be nice.

I made it up, haha but it's about right(at the time I visited the anti city forum - minority)

Bring on Birmingham - if we draw or get beat?
 
stony said:
morleyswife said:
Bluemooners anyway
71% of threads have been negative after the Derby

Yet the Mancini thread showed that 90% of blues want to keep him. It's just a shame that the knee jerkers are always the loudest.

10% of the fans doing 90% of the moaning.

I've noticed in the last 3 seasons when i've been at (home) games there are people ("fans") who you can tell have either never been to games for years or ever been at all.

A guy in front of me at the Juve game spent more time at the food kiosks than he did watching the game. Similar things have happened over the years to clubs like Arsenal and Chelsea so City will be no different. Haven't heard anyone mistaking King of the Kippax for the programme for a while right enough!!
 
90% of the time I love them

10% of the time they can all go and fuck themselves and they could disband the club tomorrow and i would give a fuck, the overpaid lazy wankers



It's who I am....It's how I cope
 
i agree i am fed up with all the moaning at match and on here! there is a bloke that sits behind me and i have never heard him say one positive thing about city ever i feel like telling him to **** off and surrport some one else! we should all be behind the team thought thick and thin no matter what! we never win at home and we never win away we lost last week and we lost today but we dont gice a **** cos were all pissed up MCFC MCFC
 
bluemoonno1 said:
Im not a moaner,

but instant win?



been waiting 34 years mate,


So whats another 18 months to get it right and then enjoy another 50-60 years of challenging for and winning many trophies
 
blutone3 said:
we were definitley NOT the better team!!!!!!

Like i said, its all subjective mate. I can see why many would see us as the lesser team. I disagree.

Not only did our defense neutralised their attack, they had zero chances whatsoever. 5 shots on goal the most but hardly troubling. The only time they slipped through was thru that chicolato guy late on, even then the tackle on him was spot on. They were left dancing outside the box and berbatov and park were rendered useless.

On the other side of the pitch, we managed to infiltrate their strong defense and caused more trouble in their box then they to us.

That for me makes us the better team. Organised, disciplined but was downed by the rags solid defense, at times contributed by parking the bus.

The reason why many believe we were not the better team is simple, because we played below the expectations of the majority. Its all about standards. For me the performance was decent enough for someone who at the start of the game would be happy for a 0-0 and be strong in the long run. Those who hyped themselves up pre-game for a handsome win, would see otherwise.

Our time will come.
 
CelticBhoyCityBlue said:
stony said:
Yet the Mancini thread showed that 90% of blues want to keep him. It's just a shame that the knee jerkers are always the loudest.

10% of the fans doing 90% of the moaning.

I've noticed in the last 3 seasons when i've been at (home) games there are people ("fans") who you can tell have either never been to games for years or ever been at all.

A guy in front of me at the Juve game spent more time at the food kiosks than he did watching the game. Similar things have happened over the years to clubs like Arsenal and Chelsea so City will be no different. Haven't heard anyone mistaking King of the Kippax for the programme for a while right enough!!

That Platypus?
 
A bloke in the South Stand L2 toilets after the game was loudly ranting, "...but I pay my money to be entertained!"

My instant reaction was to laugh at him, which I did, then the anger set in and I called him a "fuckwit". In my defence, he was a "fuckwit".
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top